------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/YoVfrB/XP.FAA/uetFAA/8LmulB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 19 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. newport
From: "my69300" <tubman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2. 57 C Brake Return Springs
From: "Elizabeth McCormick" <ejmc300c@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
3. Brake fluid lockup
From: "David Coston" <dcoston1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
4. when i put on my performance breather
From: "car man" <carbuyer02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
5. Fw: Chrysler Event at Meadowbrook Hall
From: "Bob Merritt Simplex Mfg" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
6. Anyone for horse trading? My car for yours
From: FFGREG32@xxxxxxx
7. Fwd: Fwd: very important, please read
From: "Charles Heinitz" <ccheinitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
8. very important, please read
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
9. Rock hard brake pedal and poor brake release
From: "Warren R Anderson" <wranderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
10. Fwd: carburetor
From: jlsavard@xxxxxxx
11. Fwd: carburetor
From: jlsavard@xxxxxxx
12. 300K Brakes
From: "shu5318" <BruceSchubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
13. Re: new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish tobuild/sell???
From: " Brian & Kathy Frank" <Frank@xxxxxxxxxx>
14. Re: when i put on my performance breather
From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
15. Re: when i put on my performance breather
From: paul holmgren <paulholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
16. Master Cylinder Acting Up Part II
From: "Frank Bakanau" <FBAKANAU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
17. Touched By and Angel Is Urban Legend
From: Chuck McGill <chuxter@xxxxxxxxxx>
18. Re: new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish tobuild/sell???
From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
19. Re: Fw: Chrysler Event at Meadowbrook Hall
From: "obiwan10" <obiwan10@xxxxxxxxx>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 11:44:10 -0000
From: "my69300" <tubman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: newport
Thanks for everyone's help.
As of right now I have tracked down the owner.
It has taken almost a full day of going to
the county courthouse an researching property
maps then going to the tax office just to find
the name of this person that owns the property
where the car is.You would think there would
be an easy answer to this,but no.
After all that turns out this person live out
of town,and I had to track down the person that
takes care of the property.
Finally I was told the owner will be contacted on
Monday.I sure hope after all THAT the car is
priced at a fair price.
Again thanks for all your help
I'll let you know how it all works out
Chris
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 09:05:52 -0400
From: "Elizabeth McCormick" <ejmc300c@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 57 C Brake Return Springs
Hi,
I need some help with the brake return springs on the "C".
Are they the same on the front and rear brakes ? The manual says to put the long end of the spring toward the
brake shoe. Mine are the same on both ends. The springs
on the front brakes have four turns, and are the same length
out to the hooks,and are yellow. The book shows what looks
like a three turn spring with a longer side to hook on the brake shoe. After pulling those hubs once, I"m not looking
forward to doing it again !
Does anyone have a fan and the double pulley behind it
for sale ? Or know where to look for them .
Thanks for the help in advance !!
Joe....
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 08:29:00 -0500
From: "David Coston" <dcoston1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Brake fluid lockup
Regarding the master cylinder that won't let fluid back in. I had a similar problem on a 64 New Yorker Salon once. It turned out that the vent to the top of the master cylinder cap was blocked due to the hold-down bolt being tightened to much. It had flattened the dimpled area around the hole which was also the vent. Each time the brakes were pressed and the fluid was forced out of the cylinder, the air would be drawn into the cylinder but when the pedal was returned, the blocked vent wouldn't let the air back out, and consequently the fluid would not return back to the unit. The problem was easily corrected by taking the cap off the master cylinder and using a punch to "reform" the dimple vent so that when the bolt was tightened, there was still a path for the air to enter/exit the unit. Could be your problem.
David Coston
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:31:18 +0000
From: "car man" <carbuyer02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: when i put on my performance breather
it never works properly it makes noise but there no "sucking motion" for the
air i find
becasue my stack breaker runs better then the performance
does any one know any thing about what i'm might be doing wrong
can i buy something to hook on my stock sucktion hose since it can connect
to the perfroamnce breather or is there some i can put it
??
my perfroamnce breather is a no name ac delco is that help
my car a 1970 chrysler 300 with 440 engine
holley carb
thank you for your time
shawn
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 11:54:14 -0400
From: "Bob Merritt Simplex Mfg" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fw: Chrysler Event at Meadowbrook Hall
This message is being forwarded for Mike Curtis.
Interested parties should reply to Mike at the email and phone shown below:
> Gentlemen,
> DaimlerChrysler is having an event at an upscale venue in Rochester,
> MI on May 30-June 1 at Meadowbrook Hall featuring ride and drives for
> the new Crossfire and Pacifica. They would also like to have several
> historical Chryslers on display at this event.
> We have a 1955 C300 and a 1949 Town and Country that we can use but they
> wanted some more for this one event.
> The event is actually an 11 city tour called The Art of Diving and
> this stop will be attended by many of the VIP's from DaimlerChrysler so
> they wanted to spice it up a bit. Let me know if you can help with this.
> Thanks, Mike
>
> Mike Curtis
> Account Manager-Chrysler Brand
> MSX International
> Fleet Management Division
> (248) 276-7001 cell(810) 845-0588
> Mcurtis@xxxxxxxx
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 11:56:48 EDT
From: FFGREG32@xxxxxxx
Subject: Anyone for horse trading? My car for yours
Hello fellow listers. My name is Greg, and I am a new club member. I just
recently purchased a 1964 300K and it is in the process of being restored
right now. It does not have the original motor (currently a 440) and a few
other issues make it non-original. But..........to the point. Last year I
purchased a 1979 Mercedes Benz 6.9L car from a Ft. Lauderdale dealer. It is a
low mileage car app. 54M. It is black and has a rare recaro interior. I have
put quite a bit of attention into it and money as well. It has the 417 cubic
inch V8 and is a "Torque Monster" much like our letter cars. I will be frank
and tell you that for a non-wrench turner like me, this is not a marriage
made in heaven. I really like the car, but it is somewhat over engineered as
Germans are wont to do, and therefore requires someone with more mechanical
abilities than myself. Here is my proposal.............I would like to trade
this car (appraised at 15M) for a ready to drive 300 letter car that has a
value of around 7 to 10 thousand dollars. So, if you have an extra 300, or a
curious about my "Banker's hotrod," please do not hesitate to call or email
me. I do have pictures, and you can familiarize yourself with this auto at <A HREF="" href="http://www.m-100.org/6point9/">http://www.m-100.org/6point9/">
The Mercedes-Benz 6.9 Home Page</A> Thank you for your indulgence ladies and
gentlemen. I am really looking forward to meeting several of you in June at
the Mi. meet. Greg 608-779-9305
1964 300K 8443176919
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 09:49:59 -0700
From: "Charles Heinitz" <ccheinitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: very important, please read
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. 287,000 IS WHAT PERCENT OF 250,000,000? CERTAINLY NOT A
MAJORITY IN ANY MATH BOOK I STUDIED. JUST TIRED OF HAVING OUR FREEDOMS
TROMPED ON. PLEASE READ. CONSIDER WHAT IT COULD MEAN TO YOU OR A FRIEND.
THEN PLEASE ACT/
>From: "Judy Reich" <judy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Bill O'Brien" <billnchris o @aol.com>,"Carole Neumann"
><Jenny39@xxxxxxx>,"fritz reich" <fritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Helena Schmidt"
><BirchPoHena@xxxxxxx>,"Jean Binner" <CASSINO2@xxxxxx>,"Jill Janasik"
><jjanasik@xxxxxxxxxxx>,<jmfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>,"Keith Gennerman"
><keith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Kelly Reich" <kellbell1417@xxxxxxxxx>,"Lynne Hobbs"
><lynneh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Charles Heinitz" <ccheinitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Fw: Fwd: very important, please read
>Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:57:36 -0500
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: dbeyer2@xxxxxxxxx
>To: tim gallert ; sue gloria dei ; rachel and rich doese ; Phyllis Anderson
>; pat groh > ; nick ; MiMi Festerling ; Midge McDermott ; michelle gallert
>; michael payne ; mary syversom ; mary piotrowski ; Marilyne Lemke ; Larry
>Sherwood ; lana scherer ; Kenneth Steiner ; Judy Reich (E-mail) ; joan
>ritmanich ; joan kloehn ; Jenni Treis ; jbbeckler@xxxxxxxx ; Gottschlich,
>Jill ; fred FRED GALLERT ; dorothy treuden ; Chris Urbanaek ; chris ;
>Beyfam@xxxxxxx ; Barbara Muth ; ~Samantha Lee~
>Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 5:18 PM
>Subject: Fw: Fwd: very important, please read
>
>
>
>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> >>Please take a moment to respond.
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>Please Help:
> > >>>> >>Though she's dead and has just been located,after 5 years, this
>woman
> > >>>> >>continues to haunt us from her shallow grave. CBS will be forced
>to
> > >>>> >>discontinue "Touched by an Angel" for using the word God in every
> > >>>>program.
> > >>>> >>It does not matter if you like the show or not.
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>What does matter is that America was built on "God We Trust" and
>the
> > >>>> >>freedom to practice any religion we choose. Madeline Murray
>O'Hare,
> > >>>>an
> > >>>> >>atheist, successfully managed to eliminate use of Bible reading
>from
> > >>>> >>public schools. Now her organization has been granted a federal
> > >>>>hearing on
> > >>>> >>the same subject by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
>in
> >
> > >>>> >>Washington, DC.
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>Their petition, Number 2493, would ultimately pave the way to
>stop
> > >>>>the
> > >>>> >>reading of the Gospel of our Lord and Savior, on the airwaves of
> > >>>>America.
> > >>>> >>They got 287,000 signatures to back their stand! If this attempt
>is
> > >>>> >>successful, all Sunday worship services being broadcast on the
>radio
> > >>>>or by
> > >>>> >>television will be stopped. This group is also campaigning to
>remove
> > >>>>all
> > >>>> >>Christmas programs and Christmas carols from public schools!! You
>as
> > >>>>a
> > >>>> >>Christian can help! (This is added by Tammy Pinchard: This is
>not
>at
> > >>>>all
> > >>>> >>about what religion you practice, or whether you choose not to
> > >>>>practice
> > >>>> >>ANY religion. This is about our freedom as individuals to make
>those
> > >>>> >>choices!! If others do not wish to listen to the broadcasted
> > >>>>religious
> > >>>> >>programs on radio or T.V., they have the right and freedom to
>CHANGE
> > >>>>THE
> > >>>> >>STATION. All others should have the freedom and choice to watch
>and
> > >>>> >>listen, should they choose!! Exercise YOUR right to CHOOSE!!)
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>We are praying for at least 1 million signatures. This would
>defeat
> > >>>>their
> > >>>> >>effort and show that there are many Christians alive,well and
> > >>>>concerned
> > >>>> >>about our country. As Christians, we must unite on this.
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>Please don't take this lightly. We ignored this woman once and
>lost
> > >>>>prayer
> > >>>> >>in our school and in offices across the nation. Please stand up
>for
> > >>>>your
> > >>>> >>religious freedom and let your voice be heard.Together we can
>make
>a
> > >>>> >>difference in our country.
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>Please press "forward" and only delete out what is not needed,
>and
> > >>>> >>forward this to everyone on your list. Now, please sign your name
>at
> > >>>>the
> > >>>> >>bottom (you can only add your name after you have pressed
> > >>>>the"Forward").
> > >>>> >>Don't delete anything, just go to the next number and type your
>name.
> > >>>> >>Please do not sign jointly, such as Mr.& Mrs. Each person should
> > >>>>sign
> > >>>> >>his/her own name. Please e-mail this to everyone you know, and
>help
> > >>>>us
> > >>>> >>defeat this organization and keep the right of our freedom of
> > >>>>religion.
> > >>>> >>When you get to 500 please e-mail back to Lisa Norman. Her
>email
> > >>>>address
> > >>>> >>is: LisaNormanelectric_yellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>1. Graciela Huerta- TX
> > >>>> >>2. C. Santos - TX
> > >>>> >>3. D.Medina-TX
> > >>>> >>4. Jacqueline Garcia - TX
> > >>>> >>5. Tammy Pinchard - WI
> > >>>> >>6. Jeffrey Mallo - WI
> > >>>> >>7. Amber Schroeder- WI
> > >>>> > 8.Hans Schroeder-WI
> > >>>> >9. Jason Gullickson-WI
> > >>>>10. Miguel Santiago-WI
> > >>>>11. Fernando Alvarez-WI
> > >>>>12. Ted Lake - WI
> > >>>>13. Greg Beyer- WI
> > >>>14. Nick Beyer WI
> > >>>>15. Chris Beyer - WI
>16. Karen Beyer-WI
>17. Judy Reich-WI
>18. Fred Reich - WI
> > >>>>19. Margaret Heinitz - WA
> > >>>>_________________________________________________________________
> > >>>>The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> > >>>>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>----- End forwarded message -----
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 12:58:31 -0400
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: very important, please read
Charles, and all:
Re: your message "Touched by an Angel" and use of the word "God" : this
e-mail, and message content, is absolutely inappropriate on the Chysler 300
Club International listserver. Please click on
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/rules.htm to view the listserver
rules.
Topics that are not allowed include:
- Messages with automotive content that does not relate directly to Chrysler
300's.
- Non-automotive messages including but not limited to political statements,
jokes, discussion of current events, etc.
- Argumentative or disruptive messages.
Sincerely,
John Hertog
Electronic Communications Committee
Chrysler 300 Club international, Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Heinitz" <ccheinitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <vintagecycles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <vparmacek@xxxxxxxxx>;
<truckjim@xxxxxxx>; <TNHARKINS@xxxxxxx>; <studio@xxxxxxxx>;
<s7even700@xxxxxxxxx>; <rose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <pat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<vintagecycles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <powerpistol2000@xxxxxxxxx>;
<postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <blaster-chemist@xxxxxxxx>;
<PainterIR@xxxxxxx>; <mnwolfer@xxxxxxxx>; <webefish@xxxxxxxx>;
<MTHeinitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <marimba2@xxxxxxx>;
<m.amparo.feller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <erickml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<lizn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <leprouty@xxxxxxx>; <mcprotuy@xxxxxxx>;
<Kay.Unkroth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <kat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<jrheinitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <justin@xxxxxxxxx>; <jrheinitz@xxxxxxxxx>;
<joyass@xxxxxxx>; <jheinitz@xxxxxxxxx>; <jmfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>;
<jeankin@xxxxxxx>; <NJHPainting@xxxxxxx>; <ianfoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
<helen.rodiss@xxxxxxxxxx>; <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<fremansauto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <emilenah@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
<letters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <fdubel@xxxxxxxxxx>; <Danielle.Heinitz@xxxxxx>;
<dsheinitz@xxxxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <cdavis@xxxxxxxx>;
<brett@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bcheinitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <bleahy@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
<rickywahl@xxxxxxx>; <beavs44@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 12:49 PM
Subject: [Chrysler300] Fwd: Fwd: very important, please read
> ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. 287,000 IS WHAT PERCENT OF 250,000,000? CERTAINLY NOT
A
> MAJORITY IN ANY MATH BOOK I STUDIED. JUST TIRED OF HAVING OUR FREEDOMS
> TROMPED ON. PLEASE READ. CONSIDER WHAT IT COULD MEAN TO YOU OR A FRIEND.
> THEN PLEASE ACT/
>
>
> >From: "Judy Reich" <judy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: "Bill O'Brien" <billnchris o @aol.com>,"Carole Neumann"
> ><Jenny39@xxxxxxx>,"fritz reich" <fritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Helena Schmidt"
> ><BirchPoHena@xxxxxxx>,"Jean Binner" <CASSINO2@xxxxxx>,"Jill Janasik"
> ><jjanasik@xxxxxxxxxxx>,<jmfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>,"Keith Gennerman"
> ><keith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Kelly Reich" <kellbell1417@xxxxxxxxx>,"Lynne
Hobbs"
> ><lynneh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Charles Heinitz" <ccheinitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Fw: Fwd: very important, please read
> >Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:57:36 -0500
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: dbeyer2@xxxxxxxxx
> >To: tim gallert ; sue gloria dei ; rachel and rich doese ; Phyllis
Anderson
> >; pat groh > ; nick ; MiMi Festerling ; Midge McDermott ; michelle
gallert
> >; michael payne ; mary syversom ; mary piotrowski ; Marilyne Lemke ;
Larry
> >Sherwood ; lana scherer ; Kenneth Steiner ; Judy Reich (E-mail) ; joan
> >ritmanich ; joan kloehn ; Jenni Treis ; jbbeckler@xxxxxxxx ; Gottschlich,
> >Jill ; fred FRED GALLERT ; dorothy treuden ; Chris Urbanaek ; chris ;
> >Beyfam@xxxxxxx ; Barbara Muth ; ~Samantha Lee~
> >Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 5:18 PM
> >Subject: Fw: Fwd: very important, please read
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> >>Please take a moment to respond.
> > > >>>> >>
> > > >>>> >>Please Help:
> > > >>>> >>Though she's dead and has just been located,after 5 years, this
> >woman
> > > >>>> >>continues to haunt us from her shallow grave. CBS will be
forced
> >to
> > > >>>> >>discontinue "Touched by an Angel" for using the word God in
every
> > > >>>>program.
> > > >>>> >>It does not matter if you like the show or not.
> > > >>>> >>
> > > >>>> >>What does matter is that America was built on "God We Trust"
and
> >the
> > > >>>> >>freedom to practice any religion we choose. Madeline Murray
> >O'Hare,
> > > >>>>an
> > > >>>> >>atheist, successfully managed to eliminate use of Bible reading
> >from
> > > >>>> >>public schools. Now her organization has been granted a federal
> > > >>>>hearing on
> > > >>>> >>the same subject by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
> >in
> > >
> > > >>>> >>Washington, DC.
> > > >>>> >>
> > > >>>> >>Their petition, Number 2493, would ultimately pave the way to
> >stop
> > > >>>>the
> > > >>>> >>reading of the Gospel of our Lord and Savior, on the airwaves
of
> > > >>>>America.
> > > >>>> >>They got 287,000 signatures to back their stand! If this
attempt
> >is
> > > >>>> >>successful, all Sunday worship services being broadcast on the
> >radio
> > > >>>>or by
> > > >>>> >>television will be stopped. This group is also campaigning to
> >remove
> > > >>>>all
> > > >>>> >>Christmas programs and Christmas carols from public schools!!
You
> >as
> > > >>>>a
> > > >>>> >>Christian can help! (This is added by Tammy Pinchard: This is
> >not
> >at
> > > >>>>all
> > > >>>> >>about what religion you practice, or whether you choose not to
> > > >>>>practice
> > > >>>> >>ANY religion. This is about our freedom as individuals to make
> >those
> > > >>>> >>choices!! If others do not wish to listen to the broadcasted
> > > >>>>religious
> > > >>>> >>programs on radio or T.V., they have the right and freedom to
> >CHANGE
> > > >>>>THE
> > > >>>> >>STATION. All others should have the freedom and choice to
watch
> >and
> > > >>>> >>listen, should they choose!! Exercise YOUR right to CHOOSE!!)
> > > >>>> >>
> > > >>>> >>We are praying for at least 1 million signatures. This would
> >defeat
> > > >>>>their
> > > >>>> >>effort and show that there are many Christians alive,well and
> > > >>>>concerned
> > > >>>> >>about our country. As Christians, we must unite on this.
> > > >>>> >>
> > > >>>> >>Please don't take this lightly. We ignored this woman once and
> >lost
> > > >>>>prayer
> > > >>>> >>in our school and in offices across the nation. Please stand up
> >for
> > > >>>>your
> > > >>>> >>religious freedom and let your voice be heard.Together we can
> >make
> >a
> > > >>>> >>difference in our country.
> > > >>>> >>
> > > >>>> >>Please press "forward" and only delete out what is not needed,
> >and
> > > >>>> >>forward this to everyone on your list. Now, please sign your
name
> >at
> > > >>>>the
> > > >>>> >>bottom (you can only add your name after you have pressed
> > > >>>>the"Forward").
> > > >>>> >>Don't delete anything, just go to the next number and type your
> >name.
> > > >>>> >>Please do not sign jointly, such as Mr.& Mrs. Each person
should
> > > >>>>sign
> > > >>>> >>his/her own name. Please e-mail this to everyone you know, and
> >help
> > > >>>>us
> > > >>>> >>defeat this organization and keep the right of our freedom of
> > > >>>>religion.
> > > >>>> >>When you get to 500 please e-mail back to Lisa Norman. Her
> >email
> > > >>>>address
> > > >>>> >>is: LisaNormanelectric_yellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >>>> >>
> > > >>>> >>1. Graciela Huerta- TX
> > > >>>> >>2. C. Santos - TX
> > > >>>> >>3. D.Medina-TX
> > > >>>> >>4. Jacqueline Garcia - TX
> > > >>>> >>5. Tammy Pinchard - WI
> > > >>>> >>6. Jeffrey Mallo - WI
> > > >>>> >>7. Amber Schroeder- WI
> > > >>>> > 8.Hans Schroeder-WI
> > > >>>> >9. Jason Gullickson-WI
> > > >>>>10. Miguel Santiago-WI
> > > >>>>11. Fernando Alvarez-WI
> > > >>>>12. Ted Lake - WI
> > > >>>>13. Greg Beyer- WI
> > > >>>14. Nick Beyer WI
> > > >>>>15. Chris Beyer - WI
> >16. Karen Beyer-WI
> >17. Judy Reich-WI
> >18. Fred Reich - WI
> > > >>>>19. Margaret Heinitz - WA
> > > >>>>_________________________________________________________________
> > > >>>>The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> > > >>>>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>----- End forwarded message -----
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> > >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 11:26:56 -0700
From: "Warren R Anderson" <wranderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Rock hard brake pedal and poor brake release
Good morning,
About everything has been mentioned that can lead to the above. The push rod
and bleed hole in the master cylinder are particularly good items to check.
Brake hoses should be real fresh and changed anyway if going to DOT 5 fluid.
Although replacing brake return springs can be a problem due to availability
of proper new parts this is a good idea in principle and cheap.
Have seen a lot of apply/release problems when backing plates are not
restored properly where shoes rest; squeak, grab, noise, drag. Welding up
worn areas and grinding works to restore these important supposed to be flat
surfaces.
Gummed up wheel cylinders are always a possibility and especially where the
vehicle sees only seasonal or intermittant use cycles.
Had one very revolting experience with a sleeved master cylinder done by a
very prominent supplier. The builder just forgot to drill through the new
sleevefor the bleed port so the brakes would not release occassionally.
Found this after tracing non release problem back to master by progressively
breaking brake lines from farthest brake cylinder back to master.
Had a Corvette come in with a very new but wrong master cylinder once that
would not release properly. The right cylinder was far more expensive so
possibly why someone tried what was the wrong, cheaper part.
Years ago I quit trying to rebuild any master cylinder that is intended to
run on the street. Many reasons, TNTL.
Anyway, I have seen poor brake release from all of the above and do not see
any one any more possible than any other.
Warren Anderson
Sedona,AZ
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:30:22 EDT
From: jlsavard@xxxxxxx
Subject: Fwd: carburetor
Can anyone offer any help? This is out of my league....
Joe Savard
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:38:50 EDT
From: jlsavard@xxxxxxx
Subject: Fwd: carburetor
In a message dated 5/10/03 10:27:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
carbuyer02@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> ok i got a 1970 chrysler 300 with 440
> holley carb
> want the #
> performance all out!!!
> can someone help me????
>
Sorry, guys,
When I attempted to forward this earlier, I forgot to highlight the text. I
know nothing about the Holly Carbs.
Joe Savard,
Lake Orion, MI
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 19:11:38 -0000
From: "shu5318" <BruceSchubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 300K Brakes
I have been working on the brakes of my 300K and have found that the
front brakes do not have self adjusters (not sure that's the
spelling). Is this correct? Was self adjusters optional in 64?
Bruce
64 300
300K
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 15:46:42 -0500
From: " Brian & Kathy Frank" <Frank@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish tobuild/sell???
Aussie Christopher,
I'll bite seeing no one else did. What's the third "landmark production" car
you would nominate?? You gave us two! How about the 1955 C300? That's the
one that started America down the road of the muscle car era that lasted
into the early 1970s. I know others have their opinions but as far as I'm
concerned, everyone in America was chasing Chrysler for the next 10 years or
more after 1955.
Brian Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: christopher beilby <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <lajugle@xxxxxxxxx>;
<Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish
tobuild/sell???
> Well written, Mate!
> Ray Jones
>
> > From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 12:37:48 +1000
> > To: lajugle@xxxxxxxxx, Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish to
> > build/sell???
> >
> > With regard to what name Chrysler should use on it's new hemi car - I
note
> > one detractor says in effect 'get on with your life, it (the 300C) was
too
> > long ago. A pity he did not indicate what cars he owns, or has owned,
what
> > 300Cs, etc.. May I suggest he and other like minded people let us
practice
> > our democratic right to say what we think, and those not interested just
> > delete us un-read?!
> >
> > I repeat my previous message's thought - if we had not saved these early
300
> > letter cars, D-C would not wish to re-use their names !!??
> >
> > I purchased my first 300C in Feb 1981, I had to come to America to buy
it,
> > brought it on a hunch it should be a great drivers car, this apart from
it's
> > looks.
> >
> > My first car was a 30 A Ford Roadster, and every car since I have owned
to
> > drive, my most most normal car a 1972 Lambo Espada, and for 27 years I
owned
> > perhaps the ultimate fun/road performance car, a 385bhp 1967 AC Cobra Mk
III
> > (289 hipo motor in coil spring chassis, the best ever Cobra, not the
more
> > common 'unsafe to push hard' cast iron 427).
> >
> > I have owned and driven over 100 cars, and some are very memorable
because
> > they were just so enjoyable to drive compared to others that should have
> > been the same. ( An example - the 1937 Buick Century is a brilliant car
to
> > drive compared to drive to Packard's 120 series 8 cylinder, maybe
because
> > the Packard steering is too slow, a cheap nasty floor gearchange - who
> > knows?! )
> >
> > I believe when the definitive history of 'cars before 2000' is written,
> > there will be three landmark production cars recognised, this because
they
> > possessed so uncommon looks and performance advances way beyond the rest
of
> > industry.
> >
> > Firstly I nominate the Lamborghini Espada - outstanding looks, that
> > magnificent V-12, and the world's first mass selling rear engine V-12 -
it
> > sold in thousands which Ford GT 40 cannot claim. For all it's low looks,
you
> > can sit in the driver's seat and see and drive so easily.
> >
> > The second contendor has to be the 1957 300C - most other prduction
sedans
> > were struggling to do 120mph - a well tuned a C can do 140 mph. Add to
this
> > anti-dive torsoin bar suspension maybe 10 years before Europe, the
ultimate
> > form 392 original hemi, and that so unique/outstanding body shape,
> > grille,simple but effective interior, etc..
> >
> > Argue all you like, Chrsyler created a true masterpiece. The 300C owes
it's
> > place to the 300B and the first 300, this apart from the added bonus
that on
> > today's radials it is a blast to drive, this so hard to make happen.
> >
> > What I am leading to, is what sort of cars does Chrysler wish to build
??!!
> > Chrysler should not need to try and con people into thinking they are
> > buying a piece of history to sell a Chrysler, by re-using the 300C name.
> >
> > Chrysler has a perhaps equal 'hemi heritage' - the basic design still
rules
> > the drag strips - 50 years of winning, unrivalled in history for one
design
> > !!?? Chrysler should shout it's hemi heritage loud and long?
> >
> > But at the end of it all, if Chrysler is half smart, it should try and
BUILD
> > NEW DRIVER'S CARS - NEW LEGENDS. They are the cars buyers seek out,
need no
> > fancy names or advertising.
> >
> > A more appropriate name for their new car is - the new CHRYSLER HEMI.
At
> > the worst they could call it the HEMI C. Kids, most all new buyers
today,
> > do not know what a 300C is, but hey, a hell of a lot more know of the
> > 'Chrysler Hemi'. The new car is not a 300, never can be close as a 4dr,
> > etc., but it is a hemi. Tell them to go with that, plus it will sell a
lot
> > easier, better. And if it is just 'half a driver's car', maybe the
demand
> > will grow, and they bring out a coupe/roadster worthy of the 300 logo?!
> >
> > yours
> >
> > Aussie Christopher
> >
> > I b
> >
> >
> >> From: "L.Andrew Jugle" <lajugle@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [Chrysler300] How many years did they build 300C's???......
> >> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 22:37:46 -0000
> >>
> >> One half, just like the other 300 letter car limited editions.
> >>
> >> For years in the sixties and seventies one would come across DEALERS
> >> who said the 300's were never built!!! ....because they had never
> >> seen one. It was the Japanese that inspired cookie cutter
> >> production of identical cars to cut programming costs. Remember those
> >> days of advertised $3,000 cars and everyone on the lot was $4,500???
> >>
> >> People forget that the early 300's were equivalent to TWO Corvettes
> >> or THREE T-birds if you loaded the Brute and scammed the plastic toy
> >> or Bird. ....and the 300 was built to order only, meaning you
> >> ordered your car and WAITED a few months for it to be built. No
> >> walking the lots looking for the Parade Green one.
> >>
> >> It was a whole different world. A world only RR, Bentley and few
> >> others can afford.
> >>
> >> L.Andrew Jugle, Elmhurst,IL
> >>
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp
> >
> >
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 18:07:19 -0500
From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: when i put on my performance breather
What in the world are you talking about??? I can't make any sense out of
your request.
Ray Jones
> From: "car man" <carbuyer02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:31:18 +0000
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Chrysler300] when i put on my performance breather
>
> it never works properly it makes noise but there no "sucking motion" for the
> air i find
> becasue my stack breaker runs better then the performance
>
> does any one know any thing about what i'm might be doing wrong
> can i buy something to hook on my stock sucktion hose since it can connect
> to the perfroamnce breather or is there some i can put it
> ??
>
> my perfroamnce breather is a no name ac delco is that help
> my car a 1970 chrysler 300 with 440 engine
> holley carb
>
> thank you for your time
> shawn
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 19:10:24 -0500
From: paul holmgren <paulholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: when i put on my performance breather
Ray Jones wrote:
> What in the world are you talking about??? I can't make any sense out of
> your request.
> Ray Jones
> > From: "car man" <carbuyer02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:31:18 +0000
> > To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Chrysler300] when i put on my performance breather
> > it never works properly it makes noise but there no "sucking motion" for the
> > air i find becasue my stack breaker runs better then the performance
> > does any one know any thing about what i'm might be doing wrong
> > can i buy something to hook on my stock sucktion hose since it can connect
> > to the perfroamnce breather or is there some i can put it ??
> > my perfroamnce breather is a no name ac delco is that help
> > my car a 1970 chrysler 300 with 440 engine
> > holley carb
> > thank you for your time
> > shawn
I BELIEVE Shawn was asking why he does not feel that his "performance"
purchased airfilter - air cleaner housing does not feel like it is
making any difference to him over the original air cleaner housing.
At least I think that's what I read.
He might have bought something expecting a lot more "improvement" over the
stock unit and it aint doing it.
I can't see where a change in just this piece would make an impressive
"seat of the pants" difference. MAYBE that is where Shawn is coming from.
--
Paul Holmgren
Hoosier Corps #33, L-6
2 57 300-C's in Indy
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 17:54:18 -0700
From: "Frank Bakanau" <FBAKANAU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Master Cylinder Acting Up Part II
To recap: After a short drive, the brakes drag, and the pedal gets hard. By
cracking the fitting coming off the MC I can release the pressure and drive
some more.
All the hoses are good. So I took the MC off and apart. WOW, it was full
of gunk. Now I hope I can get a kit from NAPA to replace the seals, one-way
valve etc. They just closed so I have to wait till tomorrow. The plan is
to get this one working again, find another (hint) and send it out to White
Post for rebuilding, and swapum when I get it back.
Anyone have a 55 master cylinder??
Regards,
Frank in sunny Eugene
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 22:14:28 -0700
From: Chuck McGill <chuxter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Touched By and Angel Is Urban Legend
It's been said befor and I will say it again. Check the Urban Legend
and Hoax sites befor forwarding ANYTHING with a "warning". (sigh.)
Chuck
San Jose, Ca,.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 18
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 16:01:42 +1000
From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish tobuild/sell???
re Brian and Cathy's question - what is 3rd performance looks mass
production standout champion?!
the third standout combination 'performance/looks' production car pre 2000,
is most likely Jaguar's '61-'64 XKE - more commonly known as the E Type.
There seems little dispute that the first series E's looks are still today a
standout, and it's performance (albeit tuned) of 150 mph, added to it's
monocoque construction, full independent suspension, disc brakes, and that
price that was a fraction of competitors Ferrari and Maserati, etc., makes a
pretty strong case?! ( I got sucked into having to own one, spent 2500
hours restoring a mint bodied ex-cal '62 roadster - but it is bloody boring
to drive unless on a race track - way to modern and characterless must be
the problem - give me the 300C or my '57 TBird since I threw away that ram
Ford power steering and put lower stiffer springs, heavy 4WD shocks, in the
front?!)
Regards the C-300, and 300B and 300C - odds are all of them most likely will
never get the recognition they deserve - there seems little doubt they
spawned the whole musclecar, Mustang, untold other sports personal concepts
that changed previously ordinary cars into something more forever. (Some
credit is due further back, to Buick's 30s 860 Centurys, and first postwar
ohv8 Olds, as well as Hudson?)
>From: " Brian & Kathy Frank" <Frank@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "christopher beilby"
><thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>,<lajugle@xxxxxxxxx>,<Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Ray
>Jones" <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish
>tobuild/sell???
>Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 15:46:42 -0500
>
>Aussie Christopher,
>I'll bite seeing no one else did. What's the third "landmark production"
>car
>you would nominate?? You gave us two! How about the 1955 C300? That's the
>one that started America down the road of the muscle car era that lasted
>into the early 1970s. I know others have their opinions but as far as I'm
>concerned, everyone in America was chasing Chrysler for the next 10 years
>or
>more after 1955.
>
>Brian Frank
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: christopher beilby <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
><lajugle@xxxxxxxxx>;
><Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 10:35 PM
>Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish
>tobuild/sell???
>
>
> > Well written, Mate!
> > Ray Jones
> >
> > > From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 12:37:48 +1000
> > > To: lajugle@xxxxxxxxx, Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] new 300C's and what cars does D-C wish to
> > > build/sell???
> > >
> > > With regard to what name Chrysler should use on it's new hemi car - I
>note
> > > one detractor says in effect 'get on with your life, it (the 300C) was
>too
> > > long ago. A pity he did not indicate what cars he owns, or has owned,
>what
> > > 300Cs, etc.. May I suggest he and other like minded people let us
>practice
> > > our democratic right to say what we think, and those not interested
>just
> > > delete us un-read?!
> > >
> > > I repeat my previous message's thought - if we had not saved these
>early
>300
> > > letter cars, D-C would not wish to re-use their names !!??
> > >
> > > I purchased my first 300C in Feb 1981, I had to come to America to buy
>it,
> > > brought it on a hunch it should be a great drivers car, this apart
>from
>it's
> > > looks.
> > >
> > > My first car was a 30 A Ford Roadster, and every car since I have
>owned
>to
> > > drive, my most most normal car a 1972 Lambo Espada, and for 27 years I
>owned
> > > perhaps the ultimate fun/road performance car, a 385bhp 1967 AC Cobra
>Mk
>III
> > > (289 hipo motor in coil spring chassis, the best ever Cobra, not the
>more
> > > common 'unsafe to push hard' cast iron 427).
> > >
> > > I have owned and driven over 100 cars, and some are very memorable
>because
> > > they were just so enjoyable to drive compared to others that should
>have
> > > been the same. ( An example - the 1937 Buick Century is a brilliant
>car
>to
> > > drive compared to drive to Packard's 120 series 8 cylinder, maybe
>because
> > > the Packard steering is too slow, a cheap nasty floor gearchange - who
> > > knows?! )
> > >
> > > I believe when the definitive history of 'cars before 2000' is
>written,
> > > there will be three landmark production cars recognised, this because
>they
> > > possessed so uncommon looks and performance advances way beyond the
>rest
>of
> > > industry.
> > >
> > > Firstly I nominate the Lamborghini Espada - outstanding looks, that
> > > magnificent V-12, and the world's first mass selling rear engine V-12
>-
>it
> > > sold in thousands which Ford GT 40 cannot claim. For all it's low
>looks,
>you
> > > can sit in the driver's seat and see and drive so easily.
> > >
> > > The second contendor has to be the 1957 300C - most other prduction
>sedans
> > > were struggling to do 120mph - a well tuned a C can do 140 mph. Add
>to
>this
> > > anti-dive torsoin bar suspension maybe 10 years before Europe, the
>ultimate
> > > form 392 original hemi, and that so unique/outstanding body shape,
> > > grille,simple but effective interior, etc..
> > >
> > > Argue all you like, Chrsyler created a true masterpiece. The 300C
>owes
>it's
> > > place to the 300B and the first 300, this apart from the added bonus
>that on
> > > today's radials it is a blast to drive, this so hard to make happen.
> > >
> > > What I am leading to, is what sort of cars does Chrysler wish to build
>??!!
> > > Chrysler should not need to try and con people into thinking they are
> > > buying a piece of history to sell a Chrysler, by re-using the 300C
>name.
> > >
> > > Chrysler has a perhaps equal 'hemi heritage' - the basic design still
>rules
> > > the drag strips - 50 years of winning, unrivalled in history for one
>design
> > > !!?? Chrysler should shout it's hemi heritage loud and long?
> > >
> > > But at the end of it all, if Chrysler is half smart, it should try and
>BUILD
> > > NEW DRIVER'S CARS - NEW LEGENDS. They are the cars buyers seek out,
>need no
> > > fancy names or advertising.
> > >
> > > A more appropriate name for their new car is - the new CHRYSLER HEMI.
>At
> > > the worst they could call it the HEMI C. Kids, most all new buyers
>today,
> > > do not know what a 300C is, but hey, a hell of a lot more know of the
> > > 'Chrysler Hemi'. The new car is not a 300, never can be close as a
>4dr,
> > > etc., but it is a hemi. Tell them to go with that, plus it will sell
>a
>lot
> > > easier, better. And if it is just 'half a driver's car', maybe the
>demand
> > > will grow, and they bring out a coupe/roadster worthy of the 300
>logo?!
> > >
> > > yours
> > >
> > > Aussie Christopher
> > >
> > > I b
> > >
> > >
> > >> From: "L.Andrew Jugle" <lajugle@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Subject: [Chrysler300] How many years did they build 300C's???......
> > >> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 22:37:46 -0000
> > >>
> > >> One half, just like the other 300 letter car limited editions.
> > >>
> > >> For years in the sixties and seventies one would come across DEALERS
> > >> who said the 300's were never built!!! ....because they had never
> > >> seen one. It was the Japanese that inspired cookie cutter
> > >> production of identical cars to cut programming costs. Remember those
> > >> days of advertised $3,000 cars and everyone on the lot was $4,500???
> > >>
> > >> People forget that the early 300's were equivalent to TWO Corvettes
> > >> or THREE T-birds if you loaded the Brute and scammed the plastic toy
> > >> or Bird. ....and the 300 was built to order only, meaning you
> > >> ordered your car and WAITED a few months for it to be built. No
> > >> walking the lots looking for the Parade Green one.
> > >>
> > >> It was a whole different world. A world only RR, Bentley and few
> > >> others can afford.
> > >>
> > >> L.Andrew Jugle, Elmhurst,IL
> > >>
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > For list server instructions, go to
> > > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
>http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones.?Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 19
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 23:16:30 -0700
From: "obiwan10" <obiwan10@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fw: Chrysler Event at Meadowbrook Hall
If the come to SF Bay Area I can help with my B. We have a bunch of nice
cars in this area. Could give them quite a background
Roger Schaaf
Calif
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Merritt Simplex Mfg" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 8:54 AM
Subject: [Chrysler300] Fw: Chrysler Event at Meadowbrook Hall
>
> This message is being forwarded for Mike Curtis.
> Interested parties should reply to Mike at the email and phone shown
below:
>
>
>
> > Gentlemen,
> > DaimlerChrysler is having an event at an upscale venue in Rochester,
> > MI on May 30-June 1 at Meadowbrook Hall featuring ride and drives for
> > the new Crossfire and Pacifica. They would also like to have several
> > historical Chryslers on display at this event.
> > We have a 1955 C300 and a 1949 Town and Country that we can use but they
> > wanted some more for this one event.
> > The event is actually an 11 city tour called The Art of Diving and
> > this stop will be attended by many of the VIP's from DaimlerChrysler so
> > they wanted to spice it up a bit. Let me know if you can help with this.
> > Thanks, Mike
> >
> > Mike Curtis
> > Account Manager-Chrysler Brand
> > MSX International
> > Fleet Management Division
> > (248) 276-7001 cell(810) 845-0588
> > Mcurtis@xxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap