
Re: Chrysler be warned re new 300 - TBird bites dust?! (also Regulators)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chrysler be warned re new 300 - TBird bites dust?! (also Regulators)
- From: RAKFAR@xxxx
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 02:24:19 EDT
In a message dated 5/16/2003 1:50:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time, "christopher
beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxx> writes:
<< I should have typed Lamborghini MUIRA, not Espada -
the Espada is a great car, but never deserves the greatness that is the
Muira - those astute car lovers may have realised I meant the Muira when
they saw me mention it was world's first mass production rear engined V12
GT. >>
Actually, Christopher, you should have typed "MIURA", not
"Muira", but in the end it matters not. Miura or Muira, it never won a race;
in fact, no Lamborghini ever won a race. EVER. The Miura's chief sales
competitor, on the other hand, the front-engined Ferrari Daytona, won its
class more than once at Le Mans and Daytona. And the historic record of
Ferraris V-12's of all kinds speaks for itself.
Now, lest John Hertog have a cow over this non-300 posting, let
me take the opportunity to ask if anyone knows what a proper voltage
regulator cover should look like on a 1960 300F. Sure they're black; but
should the cover be completely blank, or should it have large stampings on it
(like BAT or GEN)? I've seen both kinds. Alas, John's photo record of Steve
Albu's 300F is no help, since the regulator is one of the few non-original
items on Steve's car. Anybody?
300F'ly,
Roger Karlson
Santa Barbara, CA
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap