I really think you guys should be really happy that these cars are finally starting to comand the prices they deserve. Were talking about rare machines that are few and far between. I read an article many years ago in a magazine that predicted that one day Chrysler 300's would be the Duesenbergs of the '50's. In terms of value and collectibility. I just hope that the trend continues and carries over into the other year 300's. If things like this keep happening, 300's will be one of the most sought after and highly collectible cars around. Don't fight it, welcome it. Josh --- Joey <Joeypilot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think it is a valid point. > > Joe Schmitt > > From: Ron Stewart <rstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 2006/12/18 Mon PM 07:59:07 CST > To: moparpjf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300G manual trans > > wow, what a wonderfull club we have. you can get > info on oil and lube. plus tax advice at no cost.. > give me a break. c300ron > ----- Original Message ----- > From: moparpjf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 6:17 PM > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300G manual trans > > > > In a message dated 12/18/2006 5:58:43 P.M. Eastern > Standard Time, > John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > I can think of another Chrysler that did not > sell.it had a super powerful > motor that was impossible to keep running, a > transmission that was balky, a > clutch that constantly failed, horrible build > quality, terrible resale > values and in 1971, Chrysler (Plymouth) could only > manage orders for a > meager 10 or so..it was called the hemi 'Cuda. > > John - with all due respect, there is no way you > can truly compare your > stick G with the Hemi Cuda. It just doesn't wash. > As far as the 4 speed F's are > concerned, Wayne knows a hell of a lot more about > them than I , but even I > know that they were never intended for the general > public. They were made to > race at Daytona, and the few that were > distributed, were given (not sold) to > faithful (and well known to Chrysler) Chrysler > buyers of many years. They > were not a failed marketing program - they were > very different and special > vehicles. The stick G's were simply something > that, by most opinions, should > never have been allowed to leave the factory. It > is conceivable that the added > price for the stick was there so nobody would buy > it. If it were my car (and > obviously it is yours, not mine) I would have been > sooo gone with the > $160,000.00 that you would not have even seen my > dust. > > Another consideration - had you taken that > $160,000.00 it would have been a > private sale, out of sight of the IRS. Sell it at > auction and you had better > be prepared to pay the income tax on whatever > profit you make. That would > mean that your sales price would have to be well > in excess of $190,000 or > $200,000 for you to break even with the > $160,000.00 you turned down. Just a > thought. > > Pete Fitch > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > For list server instructions, go to > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm > > For archives go to > http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/ > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com