Hi John & all, Don't have a new wheel to mic since I have tires mounted on them. Could only mic the old wheels right now. If you look at the photos on my homepage, the photo with the ruler show the thicker bead edge on the new wheel and the photo that compares the faces of a 300-Ç wheel vs the new wheels, you can see that the lug hole areas are reinforced and the center of the wheel is thicker on the new wheels. That is why you can't use center dog dish caps with them. http://homepage.mac.com/awrdoc/PhotoAlbum5.html John, I am sending you larger photos so you can see much more better!!! Anyone else who wants the larger pictures (300 Yahoo site will not allow for jpgs) let met know and I will send them to you. Tony > From: <cotejohnr@xxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:04:51 -0500 > To: <awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx>, <george@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Thinner rims? > > Tony, > Old Tire Man (below) states that bias rims are thinner in the bead > area. Does this pertain to our '55 to '65 wheels.? Has anyone put a > micrometer (or other) on the new wheels being made and compared them to > a stock wheel? Does the manufacturer of the new wheels that have been > made for us know both measurements or are we to assume they are just > thicker? > John > > > -----Original Message----- > From: awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx > To: george@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 9:07 AM > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Danger of wheel failure unless the rims are > > Below is an opinion of an old timer: > that the pressure on >> the bead area of bias ply wheels is greater when they have radial > tires >> mounted on them, what about ³Old Tire Man¹s² quote: >> >> Nickname: Old tire man >> Review: You're neglecting a very important design fact when > comparing radial >> and bias tires and rims: How the load is transferred through the > tire to the >> rim. Radials transfer the load (vehicle + payload) to the bead of > the rim >> and bias transfers the load upwards through the center of the rim, > ie, bias >> rims are thinner at the bead area than radial rims. I was there when > we made >> the transition to radials in the 1970s and I can't tell you how many > bias >> rims I personally have seen 'peeled' at the bead when a radial tire > was >> (wrongly) mounted. I won't mount a radial on a bias designed rim, > but then I >> have many years of personal (in a professional setting) experience > to rely >> on. Safety first. >> Date reviewed: Nov 24, 2006 10:24 PM >> >> This was in reply to an article: >> >> Classiccar.com >> >> A Tale of Two Tires >> A case for radial tires on your classic car >> >> > http://www.businessweek.com/@@WsomwGQQ4NgSUwAA/autos/content/may2006/bw20 > 060 >> 504_512529.htm?chan=autos_classic+cars+index+page_insight > > From: George McKovich <george@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:25:00 -0700 > To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] Danger of wheel failure unless the rims are > > Is there anyone with "scientific" evidence that the wheels from > 1955-1962 > were inherently inferior to those built after that period?? Also, is > there > any "scientific" evidence that RADIAL tires put more stress on wheels. > From > the stories that have been related thus far, it looks like there are > more > failures with NON-RADIAL tires being told. I have been told that the > side > walls on a bias-ply tires is stronger than on a radial with a > comparable > number of plies.... I was told this is one reason to use bias-ply > tires on > my car trailer amd they definitely do seem much firmer in the sidewall > areas. Anyone with input??? > > George > > > > _____ > > From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:Chrysler300%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:Chrysler300%40yahoogroups.com> ] > On > Behalf Of Tony Rinaldi > Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 11:52 AM > To: Lettercars@xxxxxxx <mailto:Lettercars%40AOL.COM> ; Pete Fitch; > Chrysler > 300 Club > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Danger of wheel failure unless the rims are > > Hi Gil, > > Regarding your awaiting a real tire expert¹s statement that the > pressure on > the bead area of bias ply wheels is greater when they have radial tires > mounted on them, what about ³Old Tire Man¹s² quote: > > Nickname: Old tire man > Review: You're neglecting a very important design fact when comparing > radial > and bias tires and rims: How the load is transferred through the tire > to the > rim. Radials transfer the load (vehicle + payload) to the bead of the > rim > and bias transfers the load upwards through the center of the rim, ie, > bias > rims are thinner at the bead area than radial rims. I was there when > we made > the transition to radials in the 1970s and I can't tell you how many > bias > rims I personally have seen 'peeled' at the bead when a radial tire was > (wrongly) mounted. I won't mount a radial on a bias designed rim, but > then I > have many years of personal (in a professional setting) experience to > rely > on. Safety first. > Date reviewed: Nov 24, 2006 10:24 PM > > This was in reply to an article: > > Classiccar.com > > A Tale of Two Tires > A case for radial tires on your classic car > > http://www.business > > <http://www.businessweek.com/@@WsomwGQQ4NgSUwAA/autos/content/may2006/bw2 > 006 > 0> week.com/@@WsomwGQQ4NgSUwAA/autos/content/may2006/bw20060 > 504_512529.htm?chan=autos_classic+cars+index+page_insight > > Regarding the ³K² wheel covers coming off, there are 2 recesses in the > ³K² > wheel covers that engage the 2 bumps in period Mopar wheels. They are > on > either side of the valve stem. > > Regards, > Tony > > For those that insist on frequent cornering to the limit (not that > there is > anything wrong with that!) I would agree stronger rims would probably > be a > good idea. As to the assertion about the radial side wall flexing > ("twisting") being worse for the rim bead area than bias---I'll await > a real > tire expert's statement before I buy that. > > However, I think that was a function of the "K" wheelcover's one piece > construction more than the wheel. > So there you are---my opinion on the subject and I'm stuck with it! > > 300ly, Gil Cunningham > Chilly Tallahassee, FL > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and > security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from > across the web, free AOL Mail and more. To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/