Hi to all, 1957-1966 14 Inch Replacement wheels are now available directly from Stockton Wheel Service. They are lug centric and specifically designed for radial tires. Interchangeable book for 14x6.5 5-4 1/2 wheels are: 5147004M2 (2 bump) 14inch wheels: Chryslers, 57-59 & 61-66, DeSoto 57-61 Sub. S26, Dodge 64-65 Pass., Plym.64. 5147004M4 (4 bump) 1960 Chryslers incl. 300-F 10 days to 2 weeks from order. $95 each plus lug nuts (specify RH or LH or both) & long valve stems & shipping. Stockton Wheel Service 648 W. Fremont St. Stockton, CA 95203 (800) 395-9433 sales1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For more information and pictures: http://homepage.mac.com/awrdoc/PhotoAlbum5.html 50 wheels have been made for the owners of 1960 Chrysler 300-Fs and a 1957 300-C with no problems. I personally have put a couple thousand miles on the new wheels with Coker 235/75R14 radial tires and the standard 300-F hubcaps are extremely secure, if not too tight. Regular Chrysler hubcaps fit well too (those that have no teeth). Please see Tim Tomlinson¹s complete comments below regarding compatibility with his 1964 300-K below: ------ Forwarded Message From: Tim Tomlinson <tomlin@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:48:59 -0500 To: Tony Rinaldi <awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Stockton wheels and '64 wheel covers Tony, 1. I have no secrets from the group. You are welcome to post my comments as is. 2. If, like last time it came up, there is a long thread about running radials for ever with no problems, so be it. Each will have to reach their own conclusions. I did and that is why I was particularly interested in the Stockton wheels. I had hoped they would retain wheel covers and stop their rotating with radials on, and that may indeed happen with GOOD wheel covers. Just not the ones I currently have for the '64's. Tim Tomlinson > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Tony Rinaldi <mailto:awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: Tim Tomlinson <mailto:tomlin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 10:02 AM > > Subject: Re: Stockton wheels and '64 wheel covers > > > Thank you Tim. > > > Can I quote you on the 300 e-mail server? > > You can edit your comments, if you wish. > > Thank you, > Tony > > > From: Tim Tomlinson <tomlin@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:01:18 -0500 > To: Tony Rinaldi <awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Stockton wheels and '64 wheel covers > > Tony, > 1. You sure had lots of questions. Let me try to answer some if not all. > 2. I would recommend the wheels. First, and main reason I got them, they > are "new" and heavier build, so seemingly less likely to crack in the bead > area. I know we had quite a discussion on the subj, but I did see what > happened on Galen Wollbrink's Plymouth, with solid seeming wheels, when he > had a catastrophic cracking under cornering with radials. > 3. They are 7 inch wide, so the bead and sidewalls are more "straight" up > and down than the wheels I had under the care before. Three of the four > were incorrect and only 5 and 1/2 in. wide. This seems to me to make for > firmer cornering. > 4. The two "bumps" are in the same location as original wheels. Fitment of > my wheel covers seems to be as good as any original wheel. I had problems > with the wheel covers throwing off the original wheels, which is why they > were never on while driving. Each time they "throw" they seem to get a > little more damaged, etc. I no longer have four pristine wheel covers. I > am contemplating trying the four, in very good shape, wheel covers from my > '68 New Yorker to see if they stay put and don't rotate. The New Yorker > started to rotate, but stayed on, when I first put radials on it in 1973. I > know the history of the covers (and the car) rather impeccably. Anyway that > can give some relative info. Next effort is to get more wheel covers, in > good shape, for a '64 300. > 5. Wheel clearance is not an issue. I had mounted bare wheels on the > front of the car when I first received the first ones last year, and turned > the assembly lock to lock, then did the same with the tires mounted. > 6. As an interesting observation, the Stockton wheels, both this and the > original four bump set, balanced up nicely with the older tires with far > less wheel weights than the wheels that were previously under the car. My > assumption is they must be better balanced on their own than the MoPar > wheels I had. And yes, I was aware how much heavier an assembly they are. > Tim Tomlinson > > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: Tony Rinaldi <mailto:awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> To: Tim Tomlinson <mailto:tomlin@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 6:31 PM >> >> Subject: Re: Stockton wheels and '64 wheel covers >> >> >> Hi Tim, >> >> Thank you for your feed back. Seems that you are not alone regarding the >> ³K² hubcap issue. Clear silicone worked on my original ?66 300 wheels >> covers. They used to rotate and trap the valve stems. Never threw any >> though. Don¹t remember whether the wheels had the small bumps that are >> supposed to stop the hubcaps from rotating. >> >> Am surprised that the teeth of the hubcaps does not bite into the powder >> coating better than the original painted steel wheels. >> >> Guess what I need to know is how is the fitment compared to the original >> wheels? Wheel clearance etc. >> >> Do the tabs line up with the 2 bumps? >> >> Did you notice, the center of the wheel is heavier when compared to the >> original wheels. >> >> Do you think we should go out and recommend them as good replacement >> wheels for our 14² cars? >> >> Your continued honesty would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Tony >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Tim Tomlinson <tomlin@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:31:00 -0500 >> To: Tony Rinaldi <awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Stockton wheels and '64 wheel covers >> >> Tony, >> 1. Well, we had rain day before yesterday, so I took the 300-K out with >> wheel covers mounted. >> 2. Nothing magic about the new Stockton wheels. I threw off both fronts >> before going very far. I had selected them as being what appeared to be >> the most "original" in their fit. Surprisingly the two on the rear are >> still there, and they have issues now where they aren't perfect in their >> fit to the wheel. >> 3. I do believe the posting some time back from George was correct--and >> likely I will have to use something like the silicone adhesive/sealant to >> keep them mounted. Alternatively I could find something better that looks >> better and then just change for "show time". I have what I think are '66 >> 300 wheel covers on one of my 300-K's and I think they look much better. >> Also darn hard to mount or to demount! They stay put, but then I am >> running bias ply tires on that car. >> Take care, enjoy, and thanks much. >> Tim Tomlinson >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/kOt0.A/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/8LmulB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/