Hi Carl, As the owner of both a relatively stock K and a highly modified K I'll tell you I prefer "stock". When I got my first K decades ago (wow time flies when you're having fun) it came with a 413 in the trunk with a set of long rams and matching exhaust manifolds. At 23 years old I didn't yet know the difference and put the car back together as best as I could. It ran well. As parts became available I changed to the correct short rams and headers and only a few years ago put the correct 3505's back on. Although I don't believe you'll notice a difference in day to day cruising around with the car I still hope you decide to make your J original. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong but the J was the lowest production , lightest, highest horsepower and best overall performing letter car. It was the last letter for standard dual quads and leather interior. It was the last Letter available with 15" wheels or a 150mph speedometer. So.. if the parts are available why not make it the way it's supposed to be. Because it's supposed to be and not for "value". I'm sure someone out there could use your long rams for their project. If you don't do it now and then decide in 5 years you want to restore to stock you might spend another 5 years looking for the correct parts. Just my .02 Mike Laiserin Scottsdale, AZ In a message dated 7/11/2010 6:10:24 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cbilter@xxxxxxxxx writes: Hello ram experts. I have some specific questions on cross ram usage in a J. I have a J that some prior owner installed F/G style exhaust heated long rams (casting #1947168) with log style exhaust manifolds on the original C300J engine, using correct J carbs with manual chokes. I do not know yet if it has the original J heads. I am quite certain it has the original cam, as based on my work thus far there is no evidence that the engine was ever torn apart. While obviously not factory correct as is, before I consider acquiring the correct short rams and exhaust headers, which at least one of our members has available, I wanted to verify how well the long ram setup actually functions on a J. I know that the peak torque should occur at 2800 rpm vs, 3600 rpm for the short rams based on internal tube length and the fact that the valve open duration is 268 degrees on an F, G or J. However, is there some other factor at least in theory that would prevent the long rams from functioning correctly on a J, or is the valve open duration the key? In practice, from driving the car before I started tearing into it, it seemed to produce copious amounts of low end torque as I would expect. . Anyway, if someone could validate that the long rams should function OK, I might consider leaving this non-stock configuration just for the low end punch. Since this may not be of interest to the whole listserver feel free to respond to me separately. Thanks! Carl Bilter Cedar Rapids IA [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/