Re: [Chrysler300] R7 Diamond Jubilee 300 Circus

Observations on content:

1) The last sentence for the first generation introduction section (‘55-‘56) is a fragment, like a final thought may have been missing.

2) In the “300-H” section it is mentioned that the H had the “best power to weight ratio of any of the letter cars.” While that was true up until 1962, the Ram K was probably the actual best, followed closely and/or tied by the J, based on advertised dry weights and the advertised horsepower. In that same section it says that “1962 was the worst selling year for the letter car.” Maybe on a calendar year basis (I don’t know), but on a production basis it was actually it was the J in 1963.

3) In the fourth generation (‘63-‘64) introduction it states that the “the convertible returned to the Letter Series for 1964 , but the 300-K was otherwise identical to the 300-J.” That is most certainly not true. We 300 nuts are picky about details like that.

4) The features listed for 1967 were optional at extra cost and not standard.

5) The 1970 section lists Hurst production at both 501 and 485. There seems to be some leftover verbiage from an earlier rendition that need editing.

6) In the ninth generation section (‘99-‘04) there is no mention of the 300M Special (which actually was special in features and equipment). Ninth and tenth generation sections seem incomplete. As our club does not include these cars, should they be covered at all?

Some minor grammatical corrections and overall editing are still required.

Carl B

From: Tony Rinaldi

Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:34 PM

To: Chrysler 300 Club

Subject: [Chrysler300] R7 Diamond Jubilee 300 Circus

Hi To All:

Except for a revision proposed for the 300-C that will be handled by the "C" consultant, THIS IS THE LAST CALL.

Please take the time to review R7.

Here is the link:

http://www.chrysler300club.com/rcm/GenerationsR7.PDF

In all it's hyphened glory.

Tony Rinaldi

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone