Re: [Chrysler300] 1957 Chrysler 300C convertible
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chrysler300] 1957 Chrysler 300C convertible





John,
I think I agree with you-but I have become a fan of Wayne Carini  (Chasing Classic Cars) for the last year or so. He seems to know his business and be well respected. I have learned a lot from watching that show. Standards of top cars seem to be changing. 

I was working at Pebble Beach as a United Way  volunteer (handing out programs etc,) the first year the Preservation Class was introduced. I could not see why it made any sense to ship an old Mercedes from Germany with half an inch of barn dirt on it! Why not at least wash it?  I am seeing that change where now some people are saying if the car is clean and original it's better than restoration or bard dirt.  In fact, I heard the comment made that many wonderful old cars were ruined in the last two decades by restoration to a level far beyond what the factory could do.


Now, Wayne deals with a lot of multi-million dollar cars, and I have seen him consciously paint a Ferrari 275GTB4 (I think) a color other than the factory color (he painted it a gunmetal gray) and install a different color upholstery (cinnamon).Maybe it doesn't matter when you get to stratospheric prices, like the $27.5M 275GTB/4NART  car. For that kind of money, I suppose the cost of restoring correct paint and upholstery colors is a fly speck!
  Probably like you, I think a non-factory standard color for a letter car is very noticeable and to my eyes, looks dead wrong.
Mike Moore
300H factory colors all around :-)) 
       
On Mar 29, 2014, at 9:29 AM, Keith Boonstra <kboonstra@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

It does need some tweaking to be correct, but the main thing that strikes me is that no "investment grade" any car will be painted in a color it did not exit the factory in. The car looks gorgeous in black, but it will only be investment grade when it is returned to white.

Keith Boonstra

 


On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:14 AM, John L. Chesnutt <chesnutt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 

Hi George,

It is  missing the spare tire metal cover  also does not have the stainless rock shields in front of the rear tires. It appears to have the surround around the trunk 300 emblem.

 

Hope you are having better weather then we have in Portland – record rain fall for March.

 

John C , 57 300C,

 

From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of George McKovich
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 11:42 PM
To: Rich Barber
Cc: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 1957 Chrysler 300C convertible

 

Something is wrong with the trunk lid emblem also... It is missing the surround that goes around it. I wonder what happened to that??

 

George

 


On Mar 28, 2014, at 3:39 PM, "Rich Barber" <c300@xxxxxxx> wrote:

 

Interested fans may wish to view an “investment grade” 1957 Chrysler 300C convertible on e-Bay at: http://tinyurl.com/l5e68mg.  No VIN given.  Scroll down for a god set of pictures.  Bidding already to 90K, looking for 180K.  A rising tide lifts all boats (and land barges).

 

Rich Barber

300K (model, not price)










__._,_.___


To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select the "Leave Group" button

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang





__,_._,___


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.