[Chrysler300] Seat Belts & John Holst Update
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Chrysler300] Seat Belts & John Holst Update





I visited with Marilyn Holst this afternoon and was told John has had a setback and remains hospitalized with uncontrolled hiccoughs.  Those that pray are asked to do so for our friend.

 

More 411 on the smooth, black Hickok seat belts found in our ‘64K convertible and described in a previous communication:

 

Under the belt buckle covers are little sticker tags with the following information:

 

AU-1734

Underwriter’s Laboratories, Inc.

            LISTED

AUTOMOTIVE SEAT BELT

Issue No. 272 (Rear) or

Issue No. 273 (Front)___

UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC. LISTINGS

ARE BASED ON ITS REQUIREMENTS WHICH

      ARE IN ACCORD WITH SAE J4a

        CHRYSLER CORP.

 

Take a quick look at this eBay listing for ’64-’65 belts (which are identical to the front-seat belts in our ’64 300K) for a good set of descriptive pictures:  http://tinyurl.com/ob8smjy  The ad describes the belts as having four rows and this refers to the four opposing grain directions of the woven material.

 

This pretty much defines what 1964-65 Chrysler front seat belts look like and makes my assumption that hook-and-ring belt connections are appropriate for the back seats.  Below is a table of approximate lengths of the belts.  Seat belts in sedans, 4-door hardtops and wagons with bench seats may have different lengths.   I might add that the front belts are none too long for this all too diametrically enhanced one.

 

APPROXIMATE SEAT-BELT LENGTHS-1964 CHRYSLER 300K CONVERTIBLE

FRONT BELTS-BUCKET SEATS

BACK SEAT-CONVERTIBLE EXAMPLE

LATCH END

TAB END (OUTBOARD)

LATCH END

TAB END

34”

23”

39”

17”

 

Click it or Ticket.

 

Keep calm and 300 on.

 

Rich Barber

Brentwood, CA

 

From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 'Rich Barber' c300@xxxxxxx [Chrysler300]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2015 2:35 PM
To: 'paul' <paulholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; pffkllc@xxxxxxx; chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Chris Pinder' <kmaniak@xxxxxxx>; 'Don Cole' <mr300k@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Bilter, Carl' <cbilter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] Seat Belts

 

 

Paul:

I would like to see the photos of the NOS seat belt hardware. To the extent
that hardware probably varied over the eleven years of letter cars, time
tags would be helpful.

Thanks in advance.

Rich Barber

-----Original Message-----
From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of paul paulholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2015 10:34 AM
To: Rich Barber <c300@xxxxxxx>; pffkllc@xxxxxxx; chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Chris Pinder <kmaniak@xxxxxxx>; Don Cole <mr300k@xxxxxxxxx>; Bilter,
Carl <cbilter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Seat Belts

On 9/4/2015 9:29 PM, 'Rich Barber' c300@xxxxxxx [Chrysler300] wrote:
> Pete:

> I can't swear to the authenticity of the belts in our K conv. as they
> do not have the Chrysler part number tags on them. But, they are a
> mix of identical-looking belts from our K coupe parts car and the
> belts that came with the K conv. The front belts are affixed to the
> floor with hex-head, shouldered bolts that thread into factory-installed
sockets in the floor.
> I've attached photos of the locations for the front seat belt
> connections on the raised section of the sills and driveshaft tunnel.
> I understand the threaded sockets may have been sealed with a
> removable rubber plug in cars without seat belts from the factory and
> that makes sense as they would otherwise provide a direct opening to the
roadway below.

> There are two pairs of similar threaded sockets on the kickup area of
> the rear floor pan for rear seat belts. I think the bolts were
> high-strength and the threads were fine. The floor end of each front
> belt has a triangular steel plate with a large round hole in it that
> fits into the shoulder portion of the bolt and a narrow slot through
> which the belt is looped and then sewn in place. The latching hasp is
> quite plain-just a flat chromed buckle that lifts to unlatch from the
> other chromed-steel belt end which has two square holes in it. The
> outboard front bucket belts are retrieved into a plastic holster by a
> little windup spring. The center belts just flop around loose to bang
> up the aluminum on the console. The belts are labeled Hickock brand--
> P.G.-12171-1. Similar-appearing belts are readily available-mights
> well get the proper end connections defined and purchase accordingly.

> The hardware and belts retrieved from the back seat of the coupe were
> all hook-type belt ends connected to the threaded steel rings.
> Original belt connections and design may very well all have been
> ring-topped steel bolts threading into the sockets and the belts being
> attached to the rings by the hook-type end connection. And the belts
> would carry the Chrysler parts tags with part numbers on them. Data
> I've seen indicates there may have been two different types of belts,
perhaps retractable and non-retractable.
> Color-coded or not. The data indicates only front seat belts were
> available from the factory. Dealers could apparently furnish and
> install front and rear seat belts at or after delivery.

> Perhaps more learned folks can advise what the front and rear original
> '64 Chrysler belt floor connections were. In any case, the sockets
> are there for four sets of belts and I believe the floor is reinforced
> on the underside in those areas. I remember being told that there
> would not be a concours-judging penalty for seat belts,
> factory-installed or nay--so long as the buckle and belt design were
> similar to the plain originals. No gold-plated Cadillac buckles on
multi-color webbing.

snip

> Rich Barber

If I recall rightly, there were maybe only 3 companies in the USA that
manufactured 'approved' seat belts, (mainly made for the aircraft
companies) and in the early 60's would have supplied the major car companies
with product. The car companies could have specified their particular
branding attached and small design changes but the actual seat belts and
hardware would have been from one of these 'approved'
makers.

I hunted far and wide and in this area most of the early (optional 60's)
hardware was from one maker. I can supply pictures of the NOS parts I have
to anyone that asks.

--
Paul Holmgren
If you think Space is the Final Frontier, You should see my Garage!

------------------------------------

------------------------------------

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit

For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to
http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang
------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links



__._,_.___

Posted by: "Rich Barber" <c300@xxxxxxx>


To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang





__,_._,___


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.