What was different to 62, Doug, ?? when you say definitely not correct? Length of them ? If they came off 300H, how are they not correct? Part # issue only? Did they change that with wheel base reduction? If not spoken for I’ll take them. Can you strap to skid can get Estes to pick up. Any $ you incur ,I can make you whole, OK?
Car sat low?
Sometimes same thing has different part #’s , minor upgrades, (or downgrades , like Mopar did to wreck AMC 4.0 six JEEP pistons! Managed to wreck one of best engines made)--- does not impact use of them
From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 11:53 AM
To: 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Chrysler300
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs
My mistake - should have said 59, not 69.
Definitely not correct for 62 - part #2275869 or 32240686.
Guess could be correct for 59, 60 & 61.
Anyone need them - free to good home - just pay shipping.
Doug Warrener
From: "2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Chrysler300" <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 3:57:56 PM
Subject: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs
Hi Group,
Need help identifying a set of rear springs #1946113.
They came off of a 300H when I installed new Eaton springs.
They were rebuilt sometime in the past, but need to be re-arcked.
Does the 19 mean 1969?
Thanks,
Doug Warrener
__._,_.___
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap