
Piston Ring vs Stroker Piston Question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Piston Ring vs Stroker Piston Question
- From: Nico Over <nover@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:09:32 -0400
All, am in the process of finally putting together my 451 stroker motor for
my 64 Sport Fury. I am using using a set of Keith Black 280 stoker pistons
withe the quench pad milled to fit my heads (ported 462's) with Total Seal
gap less 2nd rings. My problem lies with the oil ring groove on the pistons,
they come with a supprt rail (.030" thick) to cover the wrist pin bore gap.
With this support rail it is impossible to install the oil ring (upper/lower
rail plus expander) due to lack of clearance. KB tech says run with out the
support, while Total Seal tech recommends not doing that ad getting the oil
ring groove milled/widened the required .030". This is my first stroker and
thought I would throw this out to the group. Opinions? Comments?
Thanks in advance
Nico Over
Va. Beach, Va.
64 Sport Fury
63 Dodge 440 wagon
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network