Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???

[Donnie Schanz Jr <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Heacock doesnt allow me to drive my cars to work, thats about it. I dont 
park in a reg parking lot, so I do anyway, but not supposed to. I recommend 
to all here...GET A PROPER APPRAISEL ON YOUR CAR. DONT BE CHEAP AND REGRET 
IT WHEN YOU FILE A CLAIM!!!  My appraiser is also an attorney. His appraisel 
fees is also a retainer. If I need his service at time of a claim...he is 
there and has never lost a case. This piece of info is worth a ton of $$$ if 
you didnt know it ahead of time. My buddy lost a 66 Galaxie 427 car in a 
fire. Had a half-assed appraisel and never got what he was supposed to get 
based on a stupid loop hole that was found in his policy. A good appraisel 
is 200-350 bucks. Also...dont get just the cheapest insurance...at time of 
claim, you might then realize why it was the cheapest. No other insurance 
company would insure my 409 car for near what it is worth. I would have lost 
a ton if something happened. I can now sleep at night knowing I got a good 
company and proper appraisel and an atty on stand-by.

Donnie
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Donnie Schanz Jr" <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???


> Ive had Heacock for 11 years. They were the only company that would insure 
> my 409 car for what it appraised at. I needed to use an appraiser they 
> were familiar with and then no problems. Great service. Prices are not 
> bad. I have 5 cars with them.
>
> Donnie
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "62-65 Mopar List" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:13 AM
> Subject: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???
>
>
> > Anyone have anything good, bad, or indifferent to say about these
> > classic car insurers, or another competitor?
> >
> > I'm hunting for another company as JC Taylor is ticking me off and
> > would like some input on experiences.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Bill M
> > 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> > 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 05 Ram 2500 CTD, 4WD, QC, LB, Laramie
> > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> > negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will 
> > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the 
> > content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect 
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content 
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.