Re: cam vs. weight
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cam vs. weight



[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Click here for your Golden Tee CD ROM
caacJzob7yoMza/PermissionData
-------------------------------------------------------------------


i disagree. duration and overlap kill torque. a stroker will have a lower rod 
length to stroke ratio that will increase low rpm intake velocity. lift isn't 
the deciding factor. i'm running a .510 lift cam in a 3950lb car with 3.23 
gears that has voilent wheelspin. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Like music? Get a CD Player here
caacJzeb7yoMzf/PermissionData
-------------------------------------------------------------------

----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 



b7yoMz. 









Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.