Re: Headlights and bulbs

[Tom Duross <tduross1@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your computer freezing up or slowing down?
Repair corrupt files and harmful errors - protect your PC
Take a 2-minute PC health check-up at no charge!
caadVJEbOyW3Na/PC PowerScan
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, everything you said about Daniel Stern is true and then some.
I emailed him this morning assuming he would get it Tuesday.
I asked about headlamp and LED conversions.
Well, I got back an 8 page dissertation with more information, thought and 
eloquence than I've seen in a very long time.
This guy is without a doubt, the most informed gentleman on vehicle lighting 
I think I've ever seen.
If anyone wants a copy of the email, b/c me at 6t4belvedere@xxxxxxxxxxxx
He took Ehrenberg's article apart and put it back together correctly and 
told me why.
Gary, I'm glad he's on our Vendor page, he really deserves it.
He's got a beautiful 62 lancer btw, he sent me a few pictures.

Tom Duross
Happy Labor Day everyone!
Please keep the victims of Katrina in your thoughts and prayers.
Go Red Sox
that's it. :-P

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan McCormack" <mcwheels@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: Headlights and bulbs


Schuyler Wrobel wrote:
> I've been using 1157's in my tail/brake lights for a long time, matter
> of fact I think thats what was there when I
> got the car back in 88. the only problem I can see is the center of my
> tail light lens is starting to melt, when viewed from the inside. I got
> some spare lenses at the spring fling swap-meet a couple of years back
> and noticed that they were almost completely melted through? so I
> drilled those out and put blue dots in 'em. That's what's on my wagon
> now, so far so good.


> > The tail/stop/turn/backup/license plate/etc. are proving to be much
> > more of a challenge though.  My car (cah) has 1034's and 1073's for
> > the most part (paht) and some vendors are suggesting 1156 and 1157's
> > as replacements. Anyone know about this?  Anybody?  Buehler?

I too have been using 1157's for years in my old Mopars and never had a
problem. They are a brighter replacement for the 1034's. (Actually I
didn't know you could even get 1034's anymore) I have had a problem with
burning courtesy light and dome light lenses however by using the wrong
bulbs.

Dan, Hell hath no Fury, But I do!

[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Erase wrinkles without painful injections with Nexiderm SP.
Nexiderm SP is clinically proven to reduce wrinkles by 68% Click 
here to get your 30-day free supply.
caadVJYbOyW3Nf/Nexiderm
-------------------------------------------------------------------

----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 


bOyW3N.