Re: OEM 1964 383's
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OEM 1964 383's



WHY ARE YOU SENDING ME THESE EMAILS!!!!!!!!!!. PLEASE STOP- if it does not pertain DIRECTLY to my question

Dave O <fe2orr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
Welcome Larry you are right on. that is the stamping for the 383 HP 4bbl. dave O

-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Chance 
>Sent: Dec 29, 2006 12:02 PM
>To: 1962to1965mopars@
>Subject: Re: OEM 1964 383's
>
>
>Welcome aboard Larry!!
>
>Jason
>
>On 12/29/2006 9:35 AM, Larry Harrison wrote:
>
>>
>> I am new to this forum, I have been a member of the 62to 65 Mopar web 
>> site for several years. I have a 1962 Plymouth Fruy Cv. I has been 
>> pictured on the website for quite a while, but getting to what I was 
>> writing about. My brother-in-law bought a 1964 Plymouth Belvedere 2dr 
>> hardtop, Dark blue metalic paint that was a beautiful. The big thing 
>> about the car thou was it had the 383 ci HP engine 4 speed trans, and 
>> was one of the fastest cars around here. The chebys and phords 
>> couldn't do a thing with it. I can only remember it getting beat one 
>> time and that was by a Hemi.
>> It had the 38 HP marking on the block in front of the dist.
>> Larry in WV
>> 62 Plymouth Fury Cv
>> 67 Dodge Charger
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Kinsley" 
>> 
>> To: <1962to1965mopars@>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 10:01 PM
>> Subject: RE: OEM 1964 383's
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ron Crossley wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>> Dodge during that time also offered a 2 bbl version of the 383. Don't
>>> remember the hp rating.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ron
>>>>
>>>> '64 Sport Fury 440/727
>>>> '63 Sport FUry 383/727
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> The 2 bbl version in '63 for Dodge was rated at 305hp. My folks had a
>>> wagon with that set-up and it ran great. Quite a hot rod.
>>>
>>>
>>> Rich Kinsley '64 Polara 4 dr 318poly w/goodies
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person 
>>> -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
>>> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
>>> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will 
>>> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune 
>>> the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>>>
>>> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>>>
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- 
>> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
>> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
>> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will 
>> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune 
>> the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>>
>> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>----
>Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
>'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 




--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.