Re: Racer brown cam

[dietz diggler <dietz_diggler@xxxxxxxxx>]

I DO APPOLOGIZE, for my last post on this subject, i
was wrong. I remember the question about the manifolds
now. though the exhaust will be a big weak point in my
opinion, i cant direct you to any specific place w/
comparison data. it really just boils down to what you
want, to lift the hood to a stock looking motor, or
getting every additional HP and FT LB of torque you
can. If you go w/ headers and can afford them, call
TTI about your application.   Sean
--- Robert <r.lane@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Wish i could be of some help here. Some of you may
> remember last September 
> we had our maxie dynoed and had intended to compare
> the cast manifolds with 
> the dyno shop's headers, but due to Carter tuning
> problems we ran out of 
> time and never got around to swapping them over.
> Still regret that cos it 
> would've been invaluable information :-(
> 
> If I were more concerned with 1/4 mile times than
> keeping our car looking stock 
> (albeit, a stock clone!), I'm sure a decent set of
> headers would free up 
> some power, but I'd rather sacrifice some of that
> power for the looks & 
> compliments the MW manifolds give us!
> 
> Robert
> 63 Polara 500
> England
> 
> > ----Original Message----
> > From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
> > Date: Dec 28, 2006 12:40:49 AM
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@
> > Subj: Racer brown cam
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I ordered an SSH-44 cam from racer this afternoon,
> as per  someone on the 
> > lists suggestion, can't quite remember who that
> was,,,,,,,,any  one got 
> any 
> > idea,,,,,,,,,,,LOL,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,at any rate, he
> was disappointed  that 
> I was 
> > going to run cast iron max wedge headers, and told
>  me that they  would 
> be the 
> > weak point on my engine combo,,,,,,,,,,,,So I
> guess the question is  
> has anyone 
> > seen or heard of anyone that dynoed an engine
> using them as well as  
> regular 
> > headers, and what was the actual difference in 
> output
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --
>  directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and negotiations 
> as well as other personal messages only to the
> intended recipient, not to 
> the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy, reduce 
> the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic.  
> Thanks!
> > 
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e.,
> send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to
> Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>
> 
> 
> 
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http:///u/?.. 
Or send an email to: 1962to1965mopars-unsubscribe@


http:///?p=