RE: compression ratio
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: compression ratio



Thanks, appreciate the info.

Paul
mrchristopher1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Paul,  I got the 1000lb engine stand from them and it has held my 440 
> block well.  I was sceptical as well and went and looked at it.  It's 
> well built and the price is right.  Only issue is, with the engine 
> centered, the holes don't line up for the stop pin.  It is off by about 
> a 1/2 inch.  It hasn't been a problem, so I haven't felt the need to fix 
> it.
> 
> JM2C's
> Christopher
> --
> '64 Dodge 440 2 Dr. Hard Top 
> '87 Dodge Ramcharger 
> '00 Merc Berz C230 Kompressor 16.73 1/4 - (Hey, It's DaimlerChrysler)
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: Paul Lennemann <pjlenn@xxxxxxxxx> 
> 
> > 
> > Yes Rich, I'll need you to bring your engine hoist. I'll also have to 
> > come up w/ an engine stand. Harbor Freight has one on sale now for $40. 
> > I'm a little skeptical of their quality though. 
> > Paul 
> > 
> > Richard Kinsley wrote: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Atta boy, sounds like fun!!!! Want me to bring my 
> > > engine hoist? George, I'll need my engine sling back 
> > > too. 
> > > 
> > > I shouldn't be so enthusiastic. Now you'll relly beat 
> > > me up at the Geezer drags :-( 
> > > 
> > > Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318poly w/goodies 
> > > ====================================================== 
> > > --- Paul Lennemann wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I've come to the realization that I'm going to have 
> > > > to pull the engine 
> > > > to do this right. (Did you hear that Rich?) So 
> > > > while it's out I could 
> > > > have the block decked as you suggested. I could 
> > > > also use a different 
> > > > piston like a 6-pack piston that has a lower pin 
> > > > height, raising it up 
> > > > in the hole. Either one dictates that the engine 
> > > > come out. I'll 
> > > > probably wait till March when the weather breaks a 
> > > > little around here 
> > > > before I pull it. (Mark your calendar Rich) 
> > > > I've also got a new 770 CFM Holley Carb and set of 
> > > > Schumacher Tri-Y 
> > > > Headers to put on it. I'm also looking for a 
> > > > Performer RPM intake. It 
> > > > will definitely be faster when I get done. 
> > > > 
> > > > Paul L. 
> > > > '63 Sport Fury 
> > > > 440/727 
> > > > 
> > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html 
> > > > 
> > > > William Cole wrote: 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why not go deeper and have the block decked? If 
> > > > you want compression 
> > > > > using your pistons, I think it's worth the extra 
> > > > work and expense. My 
> > > > > motor is at zero deck height with flattop pistons 
> > > > and Eddy heads and I 
> > > > > have around 11:1 compression. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bill C. 
> > > > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:43:07 +0000, "Paul 
> > > > Lennemann" 
> > > > > said: 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I got one head pulled off of my motor today. I 
> > > > was pretty disappointed 
> > > > > > in what I found. My goal is to get the C.R. 
> > > > bumped up to @ 9.0:1 or a 
> > > > > > little better. What I found was that my pistons 
> > > > are down in the hole at 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > least .140". Using the C.R calculator at: 
> > > > > > http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I used 4.32" bore dia. 
> > > > > > 3.75" stroke 
> > > > > > 0.25 compressed head gasket thickness (a 
> > > > guess) 
> > > > > > 4.40" Head gasket bore dia. (a guess) 
> > > > > > 88 cc's for the chamber volume (906 
> > > > heads) 
> > > > > > 0 piston dome volume (flat top pistons) 
> > > > > > 0.140 for piston deck clearance 
> > > > > > This yields a C.R. of 8.04:1. This was @ my 
> > > > guess for what I had. But 
> > > > > > finding those pistons that far down in the hole 
> > > > was a bit of a bummer. 
> > > > > > I was hoping to be able to mill the heads a 
> > > > little to achieve the higher 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > compression I was looking for but with the 
> > > > pistons down 0.140 I don't 
> > > > > > think that will get me where I want to be. 
> > > > > > I'm guessing if I took 0.060" off the heads it 
> > > > would drop the chamber 
> > > > > > volume to @ 84 CC's. That would only give me a 
> > > > bump of @ .23. Not much 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > bang for the buck. So it looks like I'm going 
> > > > to have to go into this 
> > > > > > thing a lot deeper than I wanted to in order to 
> > > > meet my goals. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Paul L. 
> > > > > > '63 Sport Fury 
> > > > > > 440/727 
> > > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ---- 
> > > > > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest 
> > > > to only one person -- 
> > > > > > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car 
> > > > transactions and 
> > > > > > negotiations as well as other personal messages 
> > > > only to the intended 
> > > > > > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. 
> > > > This practice will 
> > > > > > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of 
> > > > mail and fine tune the 
> > > > > > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion 
> > > > Guidelines: 
> > > > > > 
> > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > William Cole 
> > > > > wedge64@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about 
> > > > a decent email 
> > > > > service? 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ---- 
> > > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to 
> > > > only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., 
> > > > send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well 
> > > > as other personal messages only to the intended 
> > > > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This 
> > > > practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total 
> > > > volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to 
> > > > Mopar topic. Thanks! 
> > > > 
> > > > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: 
> > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > ________________________________________________________________________________ 
> > 
> > ____ 
> > > 
> > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. 
> > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Paul L. 
> > '63 Sport Fury 
> > 440/727 
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html 
> > 
> > 
> > ---- 
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- 
> > directly 
> > to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as 
> > well as 
> > other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the 
> > Clubhouse 
> > public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the 
> > total volume 
> > of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 
> > 
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: 
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> > 
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 



Paul L.
'63 Sport Fury
440/727
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 












Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.