So is the firing order still 1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2 in a poly motor? To an unejamcated guy like me it seems that it might be different. I guess the question to ask is why is the lobe sync different? Bill M 65 Coronet 500 'vert On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Gary Pavlovich <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Bill, > > The Poly cam is physically interchangeable in that the LA cam will fit > perfectly in the Poly block and appear to match up except for the #3,4 lobes > counting from the back of the cam (distributor end of motor); the #3,4 lobes > on a Poly cam are together/in sync and the LA is splayed; the #1,2 lobes on > the LA cam are together and the Poly are splayed. Imagine what happens to > valve train/piston timing if one were to trial start the motor; some > unfortunate few have stories to tell. > > Gary Pavlovich > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: "62-65 Mopar List" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:28 AM > Subject: Cam Interchange > > > > > > > I just came across this on the crane cams website: > > > > "The 318 arrived in 1967, and ran through 1986. These engines were > > often confused with the 318 ?Poly Head? engine. Cams were physically > > interchangeable, but the lobe layout was different for the LA. The 318 > > LA was also available in 2BBL and 4BBL versions." > > > > Are the cams really interchangeable? I thought the Poly cams were > > different from an LA motor? > > > > Bill M > > 65 Coronet 500 'vert > > > > > > > > ---- > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations > as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to > the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, > reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar > topic. Thanks! > > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. > > > >