Re: 360LA
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 360LA




Thanks, Don


'65 Coronet 500 stroker


-----Original Message-----
From: Don Dulmage <big-d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 5:17 pm
Subject: Re: 360LA


Piston I like best is Silvolite 1273. Summit is a dealer as are other companies. . When you roder something if i recommend it just order the number otherwise you will often get talked into something else by a well meaning but perhaps inexperienced salesperson. Mopars take a second seat often to Chevr!@#$%^&*( so one can get off the rails in a hurry. I have used these and know they work. Last one i did would fry the tires even in second and yet could run with a stock converter. These pistons are rated at 9 to 1. Only this number is though so you need to oder exactly that. oterwise you will get 8.4s or 8s. Doesnt matter what they guy tells you. Say" no i am sorry perhaps you dont understand but i need Silvolite 1273 pistons and nothing else." I normally do a 030 overbore on 360s and no more unless necessary. I hate trouble and so do most of you so I am careful not to get to greedy.?
Don?
----- Original Message ----- From: <moparbikeguy@xxxxxxx>?
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>?
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 5:40 AM?
Subject: 360LA?
?
>?
>?
> After throwing quite a few pension dollars at it, with disappointing > results, I have given up on my 273 for the '65 Dart bracket car. Picked up > a 1979 low mile truck LA 360. The pistons are .088 down but after milling, > the heads spec 52cc. Using the Comp Cams camquest program and reading the > "360 Dyno proven packages" leaves me totally confused. I need some > recomendations for the cam for my 360 engine. 9.2:1 compression, 2.02 and > 1.6" valves, stock 1979 iron heads with slight porting, Stock 273 > adjustable rockers. 1 5/8" shorty headers, 2900# "A" body, very limited > street use, 1/8 mile track, 4.10 and 5.13 gearsets, 28" D.O.T. tires, 2500 > RPM stall, cable shift 904 trans with manual valve body. Undecided on > intake or carb. I really like the idea of a solid cam because it seems > that it would be more consistent than a hydraulic. I welcome all opinions > and recomendations. LA small blocks are new to me. I know the low > compression and 2500 convertor are limiting factors, but that's what I've > got. I'd like to keep the redline about 6000 RPM for longevity. Hope that > Don kicks in here.?
>?
>?
>?
>?
> '65 Coronet 500 stroker?
>?
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]?
>?
>?
> ----?
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and > negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect > your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content > signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!?
>?
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:?
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.?
>?
>?
> ?
----?
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!?
?
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:?
?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 













Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.