Re: 360 camshaft
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 360 camshaft



Glad Done said something there./  A smaller carb that called for will result in worse gas milage and poor preformance.  The bigger carb gets more air and you get a better fuel mixture.You can go over board and go to big.  Go with the one Don recommends and you will be happy.
---- Don Dulmage <big-d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> 
> gas mileage has nothing, to do with carb size.
> Don
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Knud-Erik Holm" <kebh@xxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:18 AM
> Subject: SV: 360 camshaft
> 
> 
> >
> > Hello Mr. Dulmage.
> >
> > Thank You for your reply.
> > I have been looking at your formula for carb size.
> > And it does dictate that I should go for a 700-750 cfm. My only 
> > reservation
> > is that gas cost 2 us dollars pr litre here in Denmark. And I have heard
> > that using a large carburetor does not always get you what you want. 
> > Instead
> > it usually just increases the fuel consumption without an effect increase.
> > But going the other way just a little bit, sounds to me like a proper way 
> > to
> > start, then maybe increase it later. Maybe I will be changing the jets.
> >
> > I am only trying to start the right way, without generating problems in 
> > the
> > beginning.
> >
> > Once I built a Kawasaki z900 (from 1974 I think), with a larger bore and a
> > racing cam, adding larger carbs. It would not accelerate right; the 
> > solution
> > was to change the jets going smaller. Changed them 3 times. Finally it
> > worked; it had power all over, top and bottom. However it became 
> > dangerous.
> > When, it hit 130 kilometres pr hour. (Just above middle range rpm). The
> > frame started twisting. That's when the power really kicked in. the frame
> > and bushings were new. I sold it immediately it was too dangerous.
> >
> > Point being, I like to start in the low end and see what happens from 
> > there.
> >
> > You replied that the lift should be under .500, what about duration(I am 
> > not
> > to strong in knowledge about cams) has it any significance?
> >
> > Again thank you,
> >
> > Knud Holm
> > -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> > Fra: Don Dulmage [mailto:big-d@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sendt: 16. april 2009 04:21
> > Til: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Emne: Re: 360 camshaft
> >
> >
> > Extreme energy comp cam hydraulic with lift just under .500 (.492 i think
> > but can look it up) Good cam good manners with good power. The carb though
> > is way too small.and would barely serve a 318 let alone a decent 360.
> > Don
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Knud-Erik Holm" <kebh@xxxxx>
> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 2:17 PM
> > Subject: 360 camshaft
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am looking for a new camshaft for my 360(1974) that I have dismantled.
> >> The
> >> idea is to make a sensible street engine. I have purchased a street
> >> dominator intake and a Holley 600 dual pump and will use a 2.50 inch. 
> >> Dual
> >> Exhaust system. With original manifolds.
> >> Apart from that it is manual steering and wide ratio 4-speed manual. Rear
> >> axel is 8 3/4 3.23 axel ratio.
> >> Poly bushings all around. I have dismantled the car to pieces. And bought
> >> the bushings.
> >> There will be no heater system or sound deafening material. The wheels 
> >> are
> >> steel 8x15 inch. Still looking for tires
> >> Just so you know which way I am heading.
> >>
> >> So my question is what cam should I go for regarding duration and lift?
> >>
> >> The car is 1962 sport fury.
> >>
> >> Thanks Knud Holm, Denmark.
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> >> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> >> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> >> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will 
> >> protect
> >
> >> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> >> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >>
> >> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> > negotiations
> > as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
> > the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> > reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> > topic.  Thanks!
> >
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> > negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect 
> > your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content 
> > signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> 
> 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 













Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.