RE: Rear Springs

[Herb <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I forgot to include when adjusting LT front T bar to compensate for the SS
springs the driver should be in car.

Herb

-------Original Message-------
 
From: Herb
Date: 11/20/2009 10:14:41 AM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Rear Springs
 
The SS springs are designed to be heaver on the right side & I like them!!. 
The Short Story.   The objective is to adjust the left front Torsion bar to
level the car, pushing the right rear tire down to offset the tendency of
the right rear tire to spin before the left because of torque.  Same reason
the battery is mounted on the right side in the trunk!  Just my two!
 
          
 Herb 
 
1956 Plymouth Belvedere 361
1959 Coronet 326 Poly
1963 Fury 2D/HT 6.1
1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361
1970 Challenger RT 440 - 4 Sale
1999 Durango SLT 5.9
2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1
St. Louis, MO.
 
http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo42009.html
  
 
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Steven Charette
Date: 11/20/09 09:45:02
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Rear Springs
 
Dave,
  I like 'em.  I've had cars sit a little high on the RH side but
nothing objectionable, IMHO.
 
SC
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave64 [mailto:lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:38 AM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Rear Springs
 
 
I'm going to be swapping a different rearend into my '64 Belvedere (2D, HT)
in the spring.  While I'm at it, I'd like to replace the rear springs.  I'm
thinking about installing a set of new super stock springs, but I'd like to
get feedback from you guys who have done this.  Are they a bad idea for a
street car?  What other options may be better?  I'm looking to get the ride
hight up a little.  Even new stock springs would probably get it up a bit
higher than the 45 year old ones that are on it now, but I'm thinking
something more substantial than stock may be the way to go.  I don't plan to
make the car into a heavy duty strip car, but occasional 1/4 mile activity
will be in it's future.  I've read that some guys think the ride height is
too high with ss springs, and others think it's just fine.  All opinions are
welcome and appreciated.  Thanks!
 
Dave
 
 
 
 
 
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic.  Thanks!
 
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
 
 
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic.  Thanks!
 
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
 
 
 
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER