I was looking around to find out more of what different performance parts do to improve an engine. I found this and thought it was interesting. Maybe you will think so too. To increase torque is simply to increase the amount of air and fuel burnt with each stroke, this is in the realms of regualr engine tuning, i.e. getting as much air in the cylinder as possible. What I think you possibly meant was how do you shift the torque curve up and down the rev range? Lets take a simple 2 litre four pot engine. This engine has a rough sine wave torque curve, i.e. the peak is around the middle of the rev range, say 4.5k out of an 8k max. One thing to remember here is that while the engine speed varies greatly, the speed at which air can accelerate and change direction doesn't. This is largely about optimising the engine to work with the natural resonances within the air. First, we want to shift the peak torque down the rev range, to about 2k. There are a number of ways to do this. The inlet manifold is a good starting point. Ideally, we will want to increase the manifold runner length. What this will serve to do is increase the time it takes for one pressure pulse to bounce off the closing inlet valve, back up the runner, bounce off the back of the plenum and return down the runner to the valve opening. With the stock runner length, the amount of time this movement took was synchronised perfectly with the valve opening at 4.5k. While this effect is in sync, the pressure pulse will raise air pressure as the valve opens, creating a small boost in volumetric efficiency. By increasing the distance and thus time it takes to travel this distance within the runner, the pulses will become synchronised with the valve openings at lower rpms. The next thing we can do with the manifold is decrease the throat width of the runners. This serves to speed up the velocity of the air mass within the runner. This air mass in turn generates more kinetic energy as it travels down the runner, and creates a ram effect as it is forced into the cylinder at a point where it would otherwise be full at atmospheric conditions. The exhaust manifold runners can also be tuned in length for a similar effect. Longer runners will increase low range torque, which is why a 4-2-1 style header will yeild better low speed gains than a 4-1 type. What the ?2? in the 4-2-1 header is doing is effectively increasing the length of the primaries and thus increasing the pulse length. We can also alter the valve timing to suit a lower torque peak. In the standard engine, the inlet valve will open a few degrees before TDC, and close a few degrees after BDC, and the exhaust valve will open a few degrees before BDC and close a few after TDC. To shift the peak torque lower in the revs, we will want to decrease the amount of time the valves are open, especially the period when both valves are open together, otherwise known as the duration of the camshafts. By opening the inlet valve later, i.e. closer to TDC than standard, we are reducing the possibility of the upwards stroke of the piston forcing exhaust gas into the inlet port, as at low speeds, this will easily overcome the pressure and velocity of the intake charge. By closing it earlier we are avoiding a similar scenario, where the upwards motion of the piston on compression forces the fresh intake charge back out of the cylinder and into the inlet port, albeit with the addition of considerable heat soak. By opening the exhaust valve later, we can maximise the amount of time the high cylinder pressure is forcing the piston down before releasing the burnt gases out of the exhaust port. (It may or may not be obvious, but the exhaust gases largely exit the cylinder under their own pressure, not by the upwards motion of the piston.) By closing it earlier, we are reducing the oppourtunity for inlet charge entering the cylinder during the valve overlap period to exit straight out the exhaust port without being burnt. These are the simplest ways to shift torque down the rev range. To shift the peak torque up the rev range say to 6.5k, we want to use the same principals, but in reverse. The manifold runners want to be short in length, this will decrease the time it takes one pressure pulse to reverberate back down to the valve, and so will be in sync with the valve opening at high rpms. Likewise, the throat widths of the runners will need to be wider. Whilst at low rpm we needed to boost the velocity of the inlet charge by restricting the throat width, at higher rpm, the inlet charge already holds significant veolcity, and so such a restriction would only suffocate the engine at high speeds. Thus a wider bore in the runners will allow the engine to breathe easier at high speeds, boost the upper range torque. Valve timing will need to be changed also. In the low speed engine, we opened the inlet valve late, now we want to open it early. By opening it earlier, the air mass in the port is given more time to begin moving forward into the cylinder, and the pressure and velocity of the inlet charge is enough to overcome the residual exhaust gas pressure in the cylinder. If we opened the valve to late at this speed, the inlet charge would not have sufficient time to move into the cylinder, and we would lose VE. By closing the valve later, we are utilising the high speed ram effect of the inlet charge to cram in more air particles than is theorically possible at atmospheric pressure, even as the piston begins to rise in the cylinder. We will also shift exhaust valve opening forwards, this gives the cylinder time to ?blow down?, whereby the the exhaust gases exit the cylinder under their own pressure. Most of the useful work is done on the power stroke by about 60°, and so we are sacrificing little by allowing the spent gas out early, however what we gain, is a reduction in pumping losses, generated when the piston has to physically force the remaining gases out of the cylinder. This is an increasing possibility as the engine speed increases, so by opening the valve early, we are ridding the cylinder of as much pressure as possible. By closing the valve late, and leaving the inlet and exhaust valves with a long overlap in which they are both open, we are allowing the vacuum effect of the exhaust gas pulse travelling down the exhaust runner to ?suck? fresh inlet charge into the cylinder. These modifications will serve to improve high end torque, at the sacrifice of low end. Some systems, like variable inlet manifolds such as Toyota?s TVIS system allow two different optimisations, the same with variable valve timing systems such as Honda?s VTEC. By ultimately, even with these, the toque can only be optimised in two very narrow parts of the rev range, the rest remains a comprimise, albeit a slightly broadened one. There are of course plenty of other ways to alter the engine characterstics in design, but these are the simplest modifications to an existing design. Hope someone thought this was interestin too. Dooner '64 Plymouth Belvedere 4dr Sedan Poly 318 + Push Button Auto Trans Contact me to redneck your radio. ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy ?p=TEXFOOTER