Re: HOLY $#@&

[William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>]

I worked with steel products for 30 years and it doesn't look like aluminum. It looks like stainless but I question if it is 17 pounds.
Stainless is lighter, but not that much lighter.
Later
Bill


--- On Mon, 4/19/10, Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:24 PM
> That weight sounds more like
> aluminum.
> 
> --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 1:17 PM
> > 
> > and would stainless steel be THAT much lighter so that
> it
> > weighs only
> > 17 pounds? That doesn't really make sense to me.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Bill M
> > 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> > 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT
> > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:15 PM, William Harrison
> <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > Man on Man is he ever proud of this piece..With
> no
> > documentation is it worth what he is asking and with
> > documentation is it worth what he is asking.
> > > Even if I had a spare 15 grand, I wouldn't buy
> it, I
> > would have one made.
> > >
> > > Bill Harrison
> > > 65 Coronet 2 dr post
> > >
> > > --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Subject: HOLY $#@&
> > >> To:
> > >> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 11:57 AM
> > >>
> > >> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1965-426-Race-Hemi-Factory-Altered-Wheel-Base-K-Frame_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4395825ecdQQitemZ290271157965QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
> > >>
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one
> > person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as
> other
> > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not
> to the
> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your
> > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
> the
> > content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > 
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>