Re: Super Stock Spring Hangers

[Dodger7998@xxxxxxx]

I think that you are correct in needing them, but before you get to far  
into the swap, I hope that you checked the center bolt location between your  
orig. springs and the new ones, and that the extra length is needed on the 
front  segment of the spring, because you are messing with driveshaft length 
when you  use the extenders,,,,,,,,
 
 
In a message dated 5/19/2010 10:29:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx writes:

Yes,  thay are something like that - a little different shape, but the same 
general  design.  There has been debate in our group here over which of our 
cars  need these extended hangers, but it looks like mine needs them since 
the ss  springs are shorter, and it wouldn't raise the rear much with the 
stock  hangers.

Thanks,

Dave

--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Gary H.  <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Gary H.  <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Super Stock Spring  Hangers
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, May  19, 2010, 10:06 PM
> 
> Is it something like this that you  have?
> 
> http://www.4secondsflat.com/AR015.jpg
> AR015 –  1964-65 Dodge B body with Super Stock springs.
> 0.250 material.   Extra length so the shorter SS springs
> will fit this early B body  Dodge vehicle.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary H. 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> 
> >I'm in the middle of my  rearend and spring swap on my
> '64 Belvedere.  I have the 2" front  spring hanger
> brackets that go with the SS springs, but the studs  don't
> line up exactly right with the holes on the car.   There
> are 4 studs.  When I compare them to the stock  hanger
> brackets, they line up correctly side to side, but the  top
> to bottom is off by about 1/8".  I'm thinking about
>  drilling out the holes just enough to get them to fit -
> there's no way  they'll fit otherwise.  Anyone else
> experience this?   
> >
> >Dave
> 
> 
> ----
> Please  address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person --  directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and  negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended  recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will  protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune  the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962  to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>  
> 
> 



--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER