Re: ECU and Engine Miss Diagnosis
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ECU and Engine Miss Diagnosis



Yes the gap is 08.  Be sure to use only brass feeler gauages.  The other will demagitize the dist and it will not run.
---- Joey <jake4@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> 
> gap is the same on all Mopar electronic distributors if I remember right, 
> call Sam tomorrow during the day @ 1-800-446-7278, tell him Joey sent you 
> and ask him the gap, he has a similar setup in his really cool 67 R/T, I am 
> pretty sure it is .008
> Joey
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Donald Gallimore" <dongallimore@xxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 8:48 PM
> Subject: Re: ECU and Engine Miss Diagnosis
> 
> 
> > This distributor is the one from Mopar Performance. It's installed in a 
> > '65
> > Belvedere with a 440. FSM won't work.
> >
> > Picked up this unit to replace the one that came with the Mopar 
> > Performance
> > electronic ignition conversion kit and it didn't cvomewith an instructions 
> > set.
> > Off Summit's scratch and dent shelf here in Akron. That in itself should 
> > have
> > set an alarm off in my head pointing to the guts being a potential 
> > problem.
> >
> > Akron Don Gallimore
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Joey <jake4@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 8:24:27 PM
> >> Subject: Re: ECU and Engine Miss Diagnosis
> >>
> >>
> >> I think .008, look in a fsm as they will have the gap. Remember also the 
> >> bane
> >>of a lot of old Mopars, the firewall plug, make sure the connections are 
> >>good.
> >> Joey
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald Gallimore" 
> >> <dongallimore@xxxxxxx>
> >> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 8:19 PM
> >> Subject: Re: ECU and Engine Miss Diagnosis
> >>
> >>
> >> > The coil is a new Blaster II coil and the wires are new 7.5 or 8 mm 
> >> > Taylor
> >> > wires. Both were installed in late August and have only been through 
> >> > two
> >>races.
> >> >
> >> > I will check the reluctor to pick up gap. I do use the brass feeler 
> >> > guages.
> >>Is
> >> > it supposed to be set at 6, 7 or 8 thousand? Or does it really matter 
> >> > that
> >>much?
> >> >
> >> > As usual, thanks for the responses and any further responses I get.
> >> >
> >> > Akron Don Gallimore
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> >> From: Jimmy Peavy <peaver63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 6:17:33 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: ECU and Engine Miss Diagnosis
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Try a new coil.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jimmy
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10/3/2010 4:42 PM, Donald Gallimore wrote:
> >> >> > Last trip to the drag strip, I developed a miss around 2500 RPM and 
> >> >> > up.
> >> >> Engine
> >> >> > seemed like it was loading up but carb looked good - floats levels 
> >> >> > are >
> >>right
> >> >> > and we changed nothing on the carb. This may have been developing 
> >> >> > for >
> >>weeks
> >> >> and
> >> >> > finally showed up late in eliminations.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm going to replace the cap, rotor, reluctor and pick up in the >
> >>distributor
> >> >> > since they are relatively small cost items. Question is there a way 
> >> >> > to >
> >>test
> >> >> the
> >> >> > ECU?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Lastly, any ideas on what (else) to check to eliminate the miss?
> >> >> > Akron Don Gallimore
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ----
> >> >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- 
> >>directly
> >> >> to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as 
> >> >> well
> >>as
> >> >> other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> > Clubhouse
> >> >> public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the 
> >> >> total
> >>volume
> >> >> of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> >> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> >> directly
> >>to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well 
> >>as
> >>other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the 
> >>Clubhouse
> >>public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total 
> >>volume
> >>of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >>
> >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> >>http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.ht---------
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 
> 
> 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 













Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.