Re: wiper arms

[William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>]

No....I threw the plastic sleeves they came in away, but just ask to go in the back and match your's to the ones they have in stock.. 
Sometimes they will only have one in stock and they will have to get one from another store.
Later
Bill

--- On Tue, 10/5/10, Mike Phelps <mikeph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Mike Phelps <mikeph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: wiper arms
> To: "1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2010, 7:05 AM
> Auto Zone has the chrome wiper arm's?
> Left and right? I don't suppose you have a part number do
> you?
> 
> Michael Phelps
> 65 Belvedere Convertible
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Oct 5, 2010, at 6:55 AM, doug daniel <dougdaniel50@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > if you keep loosing them you are not putting them on
> right ,,once they are on they do not fall off 
> > 
> > --- On Mon, 10/4/10, William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > 
> >> From: William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: wiper arms
> >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> Date: Monday, October 4, 2010, 11:16 PM
> >> Auto Zone stocks wiper arms for our
> >> cars.
> >> Just bought some a couple of months ago.
> >> Bill
> >> 
> >> --- On Mon, 10/4/10, Don Gallimore <dongallimore@xxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> From: Don Gallimore <dongallimore@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Subject: Re: wiper arms
> >>> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Date: Monday, October 4, 2010, 9:10 PM
> >>>   Being the King of losing
> wiper arms
> >>> off my '65 Belvedere while tooling down the
> road in a
> >>> driving rain storm, I am always on the look
> out for
> >>> them.  However, To my knowledge, they are
> not
> >> repoped.
> >>> 
> >>>   Akron Don
> >>> 
> >>> On 10/4/2010 9:02 PM, Nick Adamski wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>> Where can i get crome wiper arms for are
> cars?
> >> Does
> >>> some body restore them? Also i'm looking for
> 63,64
> >> plymoth
> >>> savoy trunk trim.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thank's in advance
> >>>> Nick
> >>>> [Non-text portions of this message have
> been
> >> removed]
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>