To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
From: micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: '64 Chrysler Questions
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:10:57 -0600
The name is "scarebird" search under that name. I am using their disc
brake conversion -supplying my own rotor and caliper as their
recomendations, and so far am very pleased with it. 64 Dodge B
body..................................MO
{Steve Mick}
http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202
----- Original Message -----
From: "bruce buntain" <bbuntain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mopars Chrysler" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:17 AM
Subject: RE: '64 Chrysler Questions
>
>
>
> Hello Rich,
>
> Thanx for the reply to my e-mail. Your suggestion of a 4.5" backspacing
> jibes with another e-mail that I received.
>
> Someone else happened to mention TTI, but apparently headers from this
> company cost an arm and a leg and your left testicle. I will look into
> Schumacher, especially since you are the second person who has
> mentioned
> this company.
>
> I checked the Performance Suspension website catalogue, but I got a,
> "There are no products to list in this category" when I checked apps
> for
> my Chrysler. I tried to find a site for your "Scat Bird thing", but was
> unable to find anything to do with brakes or cars, etc. (Lots about
> animal
> dung, though). Do you have their web address or any additional
> information
> for them?
>
> Thanx for the help,
>
> Bruce Buntain
> '64 Chrysler 300 2-door ht, 383
>
>
>> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
>> From: rlkinsley@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: '64 Chrysler Questions
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 05:05:15 +0000
>>
>>
>> Your car sounds nice. I like the '64 Chryslers. What headers did you
>> try? I'm sure there are Schumacher headers that would fit and TTI's. I
>> thiknk the Schumachers may be better for a driver than TTI's.
>> Apparently
>> they don't encapsulate the starter like the TTI's requiring a
>> mini-starter. My rear wheels are 15X8 with 4.5" backspace and
>> P255/60SR15 BFG TA's. I'm using 15X7's on front with 4.5" spacing and
>> P215/70SR15 BFG TA's. My wheels are cheapy Pacer Rallye's but they
>> look
>> decent and work fine. I have little dog dish caps on them. Up front I
>> did the disc brake kit and poly/graphite bushings, etc from the
>> Performance Suspension outfit in Phoenix, AZ. I think the Scat Bird
>> thing would work well for you and be cheaper to do.
>>
>> Good luck and enjoy your car.
>>
>> Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318poly w/goodies
>>
>>
>> bruce buntain wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Bill,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the thoughts. I certainly have no wish to end up with a
>> > car
>> > that has "urbanized" boofer wheels, and my opinion of 'rap' can be
>> > best
>> > expressed if you put a 'c' in front of 'rap'. Your suggestion of
>> > American Racing "Torque Thrust" is indeed the style of rim that I'm
>> > looking at, or something very close to that. Don't want to much
>> > 'bling'
>> > on the car, including the rims. I have considered that rim in a 15"
>> > as
>> > well, so we'll see. Thanks for the backspacing figure and your 'two
>> > cents'.
>> >
>> > As for Beijing, well, it's a case of, "good news, bad news" sort of
>> > thing. Traffic is incredibly bad here, air quality is poor, living
>> > expenses high, and the Chinese can be very frustrating to deal with
>> > due
>> > to cultural differences, but there's lots to see and do. Good place
>> > to
>> > visit, but not so great to live here, I think. I write what I call,
>> > "Chapters from China" and e-mail them to a list of about 150 people
>> > back
>> > home, just to give them some idea of what things are like here, and
>> > believe me, they're often very different than what we're use to in
>> > Canada or the U.S. If you want to know more, let me know and I'll
>> > add
>> > you to my list.
>> >
>> > Save the 'boofers' and 'beet wagons' for the Fords and Chevs,
>> >
>> > Bruce
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318poly w/goodies
>> http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-kinsley64polara.html
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
>> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
>> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
>> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
>> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
>> the
>> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>>
>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>>
>
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network