Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???

[Joseph Bitterman <furyrestored@xxxxxxxxx>]

i have my convertible insured with grundy along with my fury and coronet and i dont have no limits when a crackhead hit me head on in my fury i was going to pick my daughter up from softball practice,and the car had 9000k dollars worth of damage they were veery helpful and did not question any thing the adjuster told the body shop to fix it and fix it right,Jim grundy is on my classic car on speed channel all the time and he even says on tv we want you to drive your  car and occasional trips to work are fine i think it must be the person who you talk to on the phone,When i sold my valiant to my cousin he tried to get insurance with grundy and they told him that they did not insure cars in NY state he was in his 60's and the next day i added my 71 challenger to my NY state policy 
that i had just cancelled the 66 valiant from ? 
--- On Wed, 2/16/11, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011, 4:21 PM
> Well, I just had quite the
> interesting call with Grundy, and they are
> off my list of considerations.
> 
> Basically they said that I'm not allowed to enjoy my
> convertible under
> their policy, and I'm allowed to go to or from a show. So
> if we decide
> to take the car out on a nice Saturday to drive around, and
> we are not
> going to a car show, or if we stop and do any 'errands" and
> something
> happens, we're screwed. It's only allowed to be used for
> "hobby
> purposes & exhibition".
> 
> Heacock however considers driving around for the day, etc,
> etc as
> pleasure use and is completely covered.
> 
> Bill M
> 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 05 Ram 2500 CTD, 4WD, QC,
> LB, Laramie
> 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Donnie Schanz Jr <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ive had Heacock for 11 years. They were the only
> company that would insure
> > my 409 car for what it appraised at. I needed to use
> an appraiser they were
> > familiar with and then no problems. Great service.
> Prices are not bad. I
> > have 5 cars with them.
> >
> > Donnie
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <mml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> "62-65 Mopar List" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:13 AM
> > Subject: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Anyone have anything good, bad, or indifferent to
> say about these
> >> classic car insurers, or another competitor?
> >>
> >> I'm hunting for another company as JC Taylor is
> ticking me off and
> >> would like some input on experiences.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Bill M
> >> 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> >> 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 05 Ram 2500 CTD,
> 4WD, QC, LB, Laramie
> >> 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --
> >>  directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and
> >> negotiations as well as other personal messages
> only to the intended
> >> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.
> This practice will protect
> >> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
> fine tune the content
> >> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >>
> >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >>
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and negotiations
> > as well as other personal messages only to the
> intended recipient, not to
> > the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy,
> > reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar
> > topic.  Thanks!
> >
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >
> >
> >
>