Re: Rear end ratio vs RPM update
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rear end ratio vs RPM update



Truck,Ramcharger,my 89 Ramcharger had a A500 with a 3.21 gear.

--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Ollie <satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Ollie <satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Rear end ratio vs RPM update
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 3:03 AM
> 
> Mo,
> Both are interesting questions that I am trying to find the
> answers too. Looking for knowledge here.
> Ollie
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: MO ( Steve Mick)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:00 AM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Rear end ratio vs RPM update
> 
> 
> Ollie, on a car that came equipped with the 904 overdrive,
> what car would
> that be? And what rear ratio would a car have with that
> tranny?
> .....................MO
> {Steve Mick}
> http://stevemick1964dodge.shutterfly.com/pictures/5
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ollie" <satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:56 PM
> Subject: Rear end ratio vs RPM update
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > My many thanks to Jimmy, Dodger and Steve. The tack
> problem solved, it was the switch on the back of the tack,
> got it in the proper position.
> > I am turning as predicted 2850 RPM @ 70 MPH
> > Think I am going an upgraded transmission to reduce
> top end RPM. 904 3sp/w overdrive. Leave the 3:23 rear end
> alone.
> > Thanks to all...knowledge on this web site has shined
> again!
> > Ollie
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --  directly to that person. 
> I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended recipient,
> not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
> fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > 
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person --  directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> 
> 
> 
> 





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.