Re: Torker II vs Performer RPM Intake

["Gary H." <62to65mopar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Also,this is one opinion: 

"MANIFOLD - If heads, cam, and compression are the "big three", the intake manifold makes the "big four". The manifold is an extension of the cylinder head. Most of the top engine masters test and re-test to find the manifold that best works for their mill.. I don't have statistical proof, but I believe a manifold should flow the same or 5% better than heads at peak. If you have heads that flow 350, I would start testing with a manifold flowing in the 350cfm to 365cfm range. If your manifold flows less than your heads, air flow becomes restricted and total power will be reduced. If your manifold flows way more than your heads, the air gets lazy, loses some velocity, and power declines." http://racingarticles.com/article_racing-72.html

Thanks,
Gary H.

>  >  -------Original Message-------
>  >  
>  >  Engine Masters - any idea how I can tap into that resource?
>  >  
>  >  BTW - I do have an Mopar M-1 and the car now runs a Torker II.
>  >  
>  >  Akron Don 

-- 
--
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.