|
Don’t know why they did that but the challenger was longer than the cuda too. Maybe cuz dodge was more luxury and would have a better ride? From: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Douglas Sutherland Found a old Consumer Reports from April 1964 that compares all the '64 models. Surprised to see the '64 Dodge and Plymouth had
different wheelbases and lengths -- I though they shared an identical chassis! Dodge has a 119" wheelbase and 210" length. Plymouth has a 116" wheelbase and 206" length. Where was Dodge's extra 3" in wheelbase and 4" in length added? Thanks, Doug in Seattle -- -- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group. http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en. |
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network