Fascinating article, Larry. Political correctness will be the ruin
of out society!
However, your reference to the Dodge LaFemme, reminded me that my
dad bought a '56 Dodge with a cream and pink color scheme.
That was the first car I ever drove - backward, across a street
& into a pasture! Didn't hit anything, but had to get towed out
of the mud.
Well, I was just out of knee pants - and Mom had left
the car running while she went into the grocery store - and that
shiny chrome lever
on the dashboard obviously needed to be pulled
down....
Anyway, I had encountered the LaFemme name somewhere quite a while
ago, and immediately thought of that cream and pink Dodge at that
time.
I'd pretty well forgotten about it 'til your post title reminded
me. I don't remember the car's model name, but that color scheme
would certainly
fir the LaFemme name.
And, of course, no manufacturer would DARE use that
name today!!!
I typed all that to frame the question: Is there any info about the
Dodge LaFemme available? And, I confess I haven't done a web search
for myself yet.
BC
The original article by Glenn Collins speaks to
Chrysler's recent announcement that the replacement for the
Liberty will be named Cherokee. Amazing that with all he
issues today of governmental corruption, corporate greed and
the theft of liberty through spying on our citizens, that we
have those who focus on the naming of a Chrysler vehicle. I
thought you might be interested in what is the first of I am
sure many comments on the naming of the new Jeep Cherokee.
PS: The response above the original editorial below by
Glenn Collins was my response to the Forward Look list.
Larry (Akron)
Welcome to the world of political
conformity and correctness. Since the name Cherokee
has never denigrated the Cherokee Nation, nor
American Indians, I am surprised that anyone would
have any concern with the re-introduction of this
honored nameplate. Maybe Chrysler's use of the name
without negative"stereotypes" will save it the
righteous outrage of America's Liberal elite,
although I see some enterprising Lawyer somewhere
approaching Native Americans to help sooth their
"offense" through a substantial lawsuit of the
Chrysler barbarians (is Barbarian an offensive
term?).
The Cherokee name is a good name, a
strong name, and a name that Americans associate
with solid, quality transportation for the family
and for occasional (or not so occasional) forays
into the boonies for the fun of driving.
That noise you hear is America
clapping for the Chrysler execs who made the correct
name choice.
Larry in Middle America (Akron,
Ohio)
57 (2), 58, 59 Coronets & 60
Saratoga ForwardLook and many more Mopars
In a message dated 6/26/2013 11:44:04 A.M.
Eastern Daylight Time, x779@xxxxxxxxx writes:
When
Cars Assume Ethnic Identities
Making its debut for the 2014 model year is
a new Jeep with a name from the brand’s
past: Cherokee.
By GLENN COLLINS
June 21, 2013
Coming to a showroom near you for 2014: the
first sport utility vehicle in its class
equipped with a 9-speed automatic
transmission. It’s also the first to offer a
parallel-parking feature. And, in
4-wheel-drive models, the rear axle
disconnects automatically, for fuel
efficiency.
Oh, yes: its name is the Jeep Cherokee.
Hold on -- wasn’t that model name retired
more than a decade ago? Wasn’t it replaced
by the Jeep Liberty for 2002?
Yet now, in a time of heightened sensitivity
over stereotypes, years after ethnic, racial
and gender labeling has been largely erased
from sports teams, products and services,
Jeep is reviving an American Indian model
name. Why?
“In the automobile business, you constantly
have to reinvent yourself, and sometimes
it’s best to go back to the future,” said
Allen Adamson, managing director of the New
York office of Landor Associates, a brand
and corporate identity consultancy.
Jeep, a division of the Chrysler Group,
explained that its market research revealed
a marked fondness for the name. The 2014
version, said Jim Morrison, director of Jeep
marketing, “is a new, very capable vehicle
that has the Cherokee name and Cherokee
heritage. Our challenge was, as a brand, to
link the past image to the present.”
The company says it respects changed
attitudes toward stereotyping. “We want to
be politically correct, and we don’t want to
offend anybody,” Mr. Morrison said.
Regarding the Cherokee name, he added: “We
just haven’t gotten any feedback that was
disparaging.”
Well, here’s some: “We are really opposed to
stereotypes,” said Amanda Clinton, a
spokeswoman for the Cherokee Nation in
Oklahoma. “It would have been nice for them
to have consulted us in the very least.”
But, she added, the Cherokee name is not
copyrighted, and the tribe has been offered
no royalties for the use of the name. “We
have encouraged and applauded schools and
universities for dropping offensive
mascots,” she said, but stopped short of
condemning the revived Jeep Cherokee
because, “institutionally, the tribe does
not have a stance on this.”
So far, marketing materials for the 2014
Cherokee model have eschewed references to,
or portrayals of, American Indians and their
symbols. That’s a far cry from the excesses
of past years, when marketers went beyond
embracing stereotyping to reveling in it.
Indeed, Chrysler’s restraint seems an
indication of just how much things have
changed.
For decades, American Indian tribal names
have helped to propel automobiles out of
showrooms. Return with us now to the era
when Pontiac’s sales brochures carried
illustrations comparing its 6-cylinder
engines to six red-painted, feathered
cartoon Indian braves rowing a canoe.
Or review Pontiac’s marketing copy, which
proclaimed that “among the names of able
Indian warriors known to the white race in
America, that of Pontiac, chief of the
Ottawas and accepted leader of the Algonquin
family of tribes, stands pre-eminent.” Of
course, the visage of the chief was
appropriated as a hood ornament.
Many other tribes were adopted as marketing
tools. Long gone is the Jeep Comanche pickup
truck, sold in the late 1980s, along with
the Jeep Comanche Eliminator.
Certainly, American Indian names are still
in the market: consider Indian motorcycles,
about to resurface under yet another new
owner, Polaris Industries. And Chrysler’s
full-sized S.U.V., the Grand Cherokee,
introduced in 1992 as a larger version of
the Cherokee and still a market leader. In
fact, its success was a reason for the
revival of the Cherokee name for a midsize
S.U.V.
American Indians have hardly been alone in
the cavalcade of automobile cultural
stereotyping. In the 1950s, advertising for
the Studebaker Scotsman didn’t actually use
the word cheapskate, but prospective buyers
were informed that “when you and your family
sit in your thrifty Scotsman...this great
Studebaker body cradles you, your family and
friends in safety.” It should be noted,
though, that the Scotsman featured cardboard
door panels and its hubcaps and trim weren’t
chrome-plated: they were painted silver.
While there is no indication that the
General Motors Viking was discontinued in
the early 1930s because of protests by
outraged Scandinavians, it’s a certainty
that no automaker’s copy writers would dare
write today that “the development of the
Viking car closely parallels the development
of the Viking youth in attaining manhood,”
where “only those best fitted for leadership
survived to contribute to the strength and
superiorities of the race.”
Moreover, in the Roaring Twenties there was
no apparent feminist backlash against the
Little Jordan Tomboy. The cover of its 1927
advertising brochure depicted a smart,
stylish woman in jodphurs and knee-length
boots, clutching a riding crop. The purple
marketing prose stated that “I am the Little
Jordan Tomboy,” with “a thousand miles of
open road before my saucy nose.”
Also hard to fathom today is the Studebaker
Dictator, “Champion of its Class,”
discontinued after 1937, when the rise of
Hitler and Mussolini gave the model name an
unpleasant odor.
In the late 1920s, the quest for association
with high-profile leaders led the Windsor
Autoworks in St. Louis to shamelessly place
a color portrait of the Prince of Wales on
its 1929 brochure for a new vehicle, The
White Prince. Buckingham Palace was not
amused, and expressed its displeasure.
American Indians have long opposed
derogatory sports-team labels and likened
fans’ use of war paint to the derogation of
African-Americans with blackface. The
N.C.A.A. has forbidden the use of nicknames,
as well as mascots, logos, signs and band
uniforms that are “deemed hostile or abusive
in terms of race, ethnicity or national
origin.”
In 1994, St. John’s University in New York
changed the name of its sports teams from
the Redmen to the Red Storm. Also gone are
the Miami Redskins and the Marquette
University Warriors; the Southeastern
Oklahoma State University Savages are now
the Savage Storm.
The Washington Redskins have resisted; so
have the Atlanta Braves, opposing a name
change or the discontinuation of its
tomahawk chop. But the Braves’ team mascots,
Chief Noc-A-Homa and Princess Win-A-Lotta,
have been remaindered.
Even aside from the use of an American
Indian tribal name in the Jeep Cherokee, the
risks are high in the introduction of any
vehicle. Automobile experts estimate the
cost of renewing a nameplate like Jeep
Cherokee at more than $50 million.
Why, given these risks, return to a
discontinued brand? “Coming up with new
names is very expensive these days,” said
Mr. Adamson, the brand consultant,
explaining that trademark research, focus
groups and legal due diligence can be
costly. The growing quest for viable names
-- and the third-rail of stereotypical
labeling -- are possible explanations for
the advent of such hard-to-spell monikers as
the Volkswagen Tiguan, and the growing
adoption of concocted names like Acura,
Elantra, Infiniti and Lexus - as well as the
proliferation of alphanumeric designations.
“New models have all of these
three-letter-code designations that mean
nothing to me,” said Stephen W. Hayes, a
Manhattan automotive historian and a
collector of printed auto memorabilia, of
nameplates like MKX, RX 350, F-150, 328i,
QX56 and GL450 that populate the auto world.
“Companies don’t name their cars as
colorfully anymore.”
Nevertheless, “just the name of a brand
itself is one of the most powerful marketing
tools you have,” Mr. Adamson said.
“Automobile brands define who you are, and
Cherokee summons up rich associations.”
The Jeep Cherokee was a winner from the
start, introduced in 1974 as a sport utility
vehicle with the latest gadgets. Recent
market research revealed that “there was so
much passion behind the Cherokee,” Mr.
Morrison, the Jeep marketing director, said.
“What was really interesting was that
people’s fondness for the Cherokee was
greater than that for Liberty.”
Giving the new Jeep its old tribal name may
have seemed just another acceptable risk.
“Names can be polarizing, and can cause
controversy, so you have to be careful,” Mr.
Adamson said, but opposition to brand names
has become something of a national pastime.
“Anytime you introduce a name, someone will
be upset.”
A name that has zero associations is even
more likely to sabotage a new model’s
introduction. “If you have a name that
offends nobody, then you end up with a
forgettable brand” that won’t cling to the
memory, Mr. Adamson said.
“So,” he said, “it just won’t be sticky.”
=Lou=
~~~~~~~~~~ **-=\/=-** ~~~~~~~~~~
The opposite of bravery is not cowardice, but conformity. Robert Anthony
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or
set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
Help The Forward Look with
every Amazon purchase by clicking here!
Help the Forward Look with
every eBay purchase by starting your search
here!
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your
subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
Help The Forward Look with every
Amazon purchase by clicking here!
Help the Forward Look with every
eBay purchase by starting your search here!
--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one
person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car
transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages,
only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send
your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public
email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the
total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar
topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html
and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
|