|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=4065&type=profile&rnd=596) Member
Posts: 46
![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) Location: Gooding, ID | So I have this 413 engine block that I'm contemplating using for a future project. I also have a 383 LB from a '59 DeSoto, so I'm wondering if the heads will interchange? Acquired a 4bbl manifold intake from a '70 Roadrunner as well (383 engine) as well, and trying to find out if all this will fit together. I do not have pistons for the 413, so I'm wondering if it's worth while to go through all this trouble or just find a 440 which will be easier to source parts for. I was told this is a truck engine, so I'm not sure this would be better for a boat anchor or would it be worth while to proceed with? Lots of questions, but better now than $$$$ into it. Thanks!
Photos are small, so here are the numbers;
Block: 1852029-3 RL
A2
4R
11 6
S41
Intake: 2806301
Edited by 59Firedome 2023-08-05 11:05 PM
(53095595052_283fa0319c_q.jpg)
(53096559460_3eef32df98_q.jpg)
(53096336789_550fb85a1a_q.jpg)
(53095594557_667084cac2_q.jpg)
(53096158391_d75ba4abeb_q.jpg)
(53096157966_dcdf4a2831_q.jpg)
(53096158426_8d3fd1f0a5_q.jpg)
(53096335079_5a54356c89_q.jpg)
Attachments ----------------
53095595052_283fa0319c_q.jpg (10KB - 58 downloads)
53096559460_3eef32df98_q.jpg (8KB - 59 downloads)
53096336789_550fb85a1a_q.jpg (8KB - 52 downloads)
53095594557_667084cac2_q.jpg (10KB - 54 downloads)
53096158391_d75ba4abeb_q.jpg (10KB - 54 downloads)
53096157966_dcdf4a2831_q.jpg (10KB - 54 downloads)
53096158426_8d3fd1f0a5_q.jpg (11KB - 52 downloads)
53096335079_5a54356c89_q.jpg (8KB - 57 downloads)
|
|
|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=3507&type=profile&rnd=906) Expert 5K+
Posts: 6519
![5000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/5000.gif) ![1000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/1000.gif) ![500](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/500.gif) Location: Newark, Texas (Fort Worth) | Hmmm... 383 is a low deck engine from the RR. 1959 Desoto 383 is a tall deck (RB) I believe. and the 413 is an RB Raised Deck block also. Heads should fit, Your Intake would need spacers to fit a tall deck engine. |
|
|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=47&type=profile) Expert 5K+
Posts: 7453
![5000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/5000.gif) ![2000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/2000.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) ![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) Location: northern germany | mstrug - 2023-08-06 9:24 AM
Hmmm... 383 is a low deck engine from the RR. 1959 Desoto 383 is a tall deck (RB) I believe. and the 413 is an RB Raised Deck block also. Heads should fit, Your Intake would need spacers to fit a tall deck engine.
No, the 383 59 Desoto is a Low Deck. The ONLY manufacturer that used the tall deck 383 was Chrysler, 59/60 only. |
|
|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=140&type=profile&rnd=753) Expert 5K+
Posts: 9741
![5000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/5000.gif) ![2000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/2000.gif) ![2000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/2000.gif) ![500](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/500.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) Location: So. Cal | The difference in piston price 413 vs. 440 is around $150. Is that worth finding a new engine? I don't think so. Also, a 440 will consume a lot more fuel which will hinder you from driving it more. Personally, I would go with the 413 or 383. As Mark stated, your 383 intake won't fit the 413, or a 440 for that matter.
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/314331518442
|
|
|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=4065&type=profile&rnd=596) Member
Posts: 46
![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) Location: Gooding, ID | Good to know, sounds like a spacer for the intake and I'll be good to go. You're right, $150 difference for the pistons I'll go with what I've got and build the 413. What's the difference anyways between a standard block and one built for a truck? I read somewhere this would be the same block used (bored out) for the 426 engines as well, but don't know if this is a fact |
|
|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=4947&type=profile&rnd=821) Elite Veteran
Posts: 891
![500](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/500.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![100](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/100.gif) ![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) ![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) ![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) Location: Peoples Republic of Oregon | 1960fury - 2023-08-06 6:35 AM
mstrug - 2023-08-06 9:24 AM
Hmmm... 383 is a low deck engine from the RR. 1959 Desoto 383 is a tall deck (RB) I believe. and the 413 is an RB Raised Deck block also. Heads should fit, Your Intake would need spacers to fit a tall deck engine.
No, the 383 59 Desoto is a Low Deck. The ONLY manufacturer that used the tall deck 383 was Chrysler, 59/60 only.
Agreed, the sales literature indicates the B engine was the only offering, either 361 or 383. |
|
|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=4065&type=profile&rnd=596) Member
Posts: 46
![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) Location: Gooding, ID | Thanks for the link, so I guess A2 decoded means "A = 0.020-in. oversized cylinder bore" which is what they used for trucks and max performance vehicles then, makes sense it being a little beefier in that case. "1852029… 413… 1959-62… RB Max Perf. & Truck". The 4R I assume means regular gas. |
|
|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=3507&type=profile&rnd=906) Expert 5K+
Posts: 6519
![5000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/5000.gif) ![1000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/1000.gif) ![500](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/500.gif) Location: Newark, Texas (Fort Worth) | 1960fury - 2023-08-06 8:35 AM
mstrug - 2023-08-06 9:24 AM
Hmmm... 383 is a low deck engine from the RR. 1959 Desoto 383 is a tall deck (RB) I believe. and the 413 is an RB Raised Deck block also. Heads should fit, Your Intake would need spacers to fit a tall deck engine.
No, the 383 59 Desoto is a Low Deck. The ONLY manufacturer that used the tall deck 383 was Chrysler, 59/60 only.
O.K. that's right. Chrysler only got the tall block 383, My bad. A new intake might cost the same as spacers. You can sell your 4 bbl intake to fund a proper one. Marc. |
|
|
|
![](/forums/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=2365&type=profile&rnd=406) Expert
Posts: 3037
![2000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/2000.gif) ![1000](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/1000.gif) ![25](http://mail.forwardlook.net/forums/images/decorations/multiple/25.gif) Location: N.W. Fla. | The "usual" comment about BB truck & motorhome engines is to put car heads on them...
|
|
|