RE: IML: Was About Tom McCahill, and his judgement of the car in '67/ now demo guys

["Woolf,Richard T(Contractor)" <richard.woolf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I want someone in the club to define "tougher."

I find that very hard to believe that a unibody car is stronger than body on
frame. Considering the size of the frame on my '66. My '66 is built like a
tank, and is over 200 lbs. more than my '73 which as you all know is a
unibody car.

Rich Woolf
'66 Crown
'73 LeBaron
'75 LeBaron 

-----Original Message-----
From: imperialman [mailto:imperialman@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:17 PM
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: IML: Was About Tom McCahill, and his judgement of the car in '67/
now demo guys

Actually I think "our friends " keep a close eye on our IML want ads and 
probably the mailing list itself looking for deals.
A recent poll on one of our "friends" websites had the 67-68's voted tougher

than the  64-66 Imperials.

Clay Smith
67  Crown Coupe
60 Custom

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dardal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: IML: About Tom McCahill, and his judgement of the car in '67


> Let's hope that this will never reach the ears of our "friends"!
>
> D^2
>
> Quoting Hugh & Therese <hugtrees@xxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Dimitrios,
>>
>> Are you suggesting that our friends in the demolition derby game should
>> start snapping up 67 & 68 Imperials?  And I thought you just liked racing
>> them on the roads!
>>
>> Hugh
>> TFIC
>> (Tongue firmly in cheek)
>>
>>
>> > Another unique feature of the 67-68's is the amazing strength of the
>> > front structure.  Even though some folks in the demolition community 
>> > seem
>> > to
>> > prefer the earlier Imperials, the front end structure of the 67-68s is 
>> > far
>>
>> > more
>> > reinforced, which means better safety and vehicle survivability in a 
>> > rough
>> > crush.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
>> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
>> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
>> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> 



-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm


-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm