Re: IML: 56 Ignition - Part 2
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: 56 Ignition - Part 2
- From: randalpark@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:44:51 -0500
If the distributor worked before, ten it is probably the correct one
for the car. Are you SURE that you put it back in correctly? If memory
services me, it will slip in more than one way. Some Chryslers it is
either in wrong or in right. Others have teeth which may allow the
distributor to be installed slightly incorrectly. Your description
sounds to me like the timing is way off.
That said, and me not being there, carburetion and ignition problems
share the same symptoms. I never work on both at the same time, but you
may have other problems. If the car ran great before, it will again.
Paul W.
-----Original Message-----
From: jcantor791@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 7:47 AM
Subject: IML: 56 Ignition - Part 2
Thanks to everyone who offered suggestions to my earlier post. Since I
had today off, I decided to put some of those ideas to use. Voltage
across the open points was 12V and between the coil and ground with
closed points is about 9V - less than full voltage which means that the
ballast resistor is indeed in the circuit and is working but not as low
as I was expecting.
Then I decided to take the next step. I was able to pull the
distributor, clean and reset the points, and replace the condenser. I
also put in a new coil as the old one was definitely leaking oil. The
car started pretty quickly considering it's 25F out there and it hasn't
been run for at least two months. Idle was okay but not great and
almost any effort to rev it up made things much worse. I was able to
back it out of the garage and then pull back in. Putting a load on the
engine made things a little better at idle but much worse above that.
Despite feeling little if any free play in the distributor while I had
it in the vise on the workbench, I'm beginning to think that it may
need to be rebuilt. Perhaps either the mechanical or vacuum advance are
the issue or some other more basic parts mechanics there. Interestingly
enough, I discovered that while this is the distributor that has been
on the car since I got it in 2003 and has run very well up until last
summer, it is not the correct part number according to the factory
parts manual I have.
Right now I'm putting this project back on hold until the weather warms
up again.
Jeff
'56 Sedan
Trenton, NJ
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Pleasereply
to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will beshared with
everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network