Re: IML: Motor Mounts

[PAUL WENTINK <randalpark@xxxxxxx>]

Thanks for clearing this up also. I used the words "probably mistaken" 
since I couldn't think of a reason why they would be different, other 
than having the 440 vs. the 413 which shouldn't make a difference, but 
remembered seeing them listed separately from '59 through '65.

Thanks again!

Paul W.


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Schmitt <bsbrbank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:20 pm
Subject: IML: Motor Mounts


> I am probably mistaken, but I think the '66 engine is mounted to the 
> frame differently that the previous. 
 
No, it's the same. Many parts books erroneously classify the '66 motor 
mounts with '67 and later. Because of this and much other 
misinformation (some on the Club website long ago), I created a webpage 
for these motor mounts: 
 
http://teamchicago.com/imperial/impmm.htm ;
 
Note that the non-standard replacement I had made (and those by 
Imperial Services) does not have metal -to-metal contact and works as 
well as the original Floating Power design. 
 
 
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- 
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply 
to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with 
everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the 
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx 
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm ;
 


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com

-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm