Hello All;
I suspect that an Imperial with crank windows would
likely have been a special order car regardless of model. In the case of the
year of my car, 1954, power windows, power steering, heater, radio, dash clock,
automatic transmission, and tinted windows were all standard in the Custom
series. What was not standard was A.C, twin outside mirrors, the Ausco Lambert
Disk Brakes, and spoked rims, I don't know about the power bench seat.
Likely there were some options on upholstery and paint schemes as well. I can't
speak for a later model Imperial but to leave out any of the standard items
listed, like a radio or power windows, would be a delete option.
Best Regards
Arran Foster
1954 Imperial Newport
Needing A Left Side tailight bezel and other trim
parts.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:25
PM
Subject: IML: Cranked Windows
I have seen a '61 in Katy, TX without power windows. I do not know
what trim level car was involved but the windows were definitely the old
wind-up style. Kenyon Wills <imperialist1960@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
OK.
Tell
ya what: I'll retract the word "stripper" and I do apologize if it
offends, and no, I didn't stop to consider that your car has a feminine
name when I chose that word.
What I don't see, Hugh, is a better
definition of what a custom is in your letter. OK. Fine.
I'm not
writing this to push your button, but if you're going to disagree with a
definition, the least you could do is offer a correction/corroboration
for your position after pointing out something that you consider
inaccurate, right? I try to, anyway.
SO: Chrysler, it seems to me,
would have had reason to have created three model lines, however
closely related, so as to differentiate different
price points/choices/trim & accessory levels.
If a Custom has
the same stuff that a Crown or LeBaron did (besides the rear glass), why
bother with the model names at all? Riddle me that, Batman.
If
there are three models, that are somehow sold as being in order of
good-better-best, then based on my experience in our free-market system,
one of the three different models has to be the "base" or "least
fully optioned" or something akin to a upper car but without the
options (or "stripped of options" or "stripper", an industry term that is
relative to other similar models, implying lower profit due to lower
markup), right? That's what I was getting at.
Last but not
least: 1967 saw MANUAL cranks on the vent windows on some "base" model
Imperials, and I'm talking about the general run of cars here, not
just the incredibly lovely 1957-59's.
I called Lowell, praying
that he'd have a 57-59 in his yard with a crank in it so that I could
send you a picture, but he agrees that no cranks were offered till
1967.
-Kenyon Wills instigator of the great window crank
debate of '05
--- Hugh
& Therese wrote:
> Kenyon wrote: >
> Customs were stipper cars that had most extra-cost > things
deleted. There are cars running around with > manual windows and no AC
and so forth, which > generally > are the base models. Most
dealers would not order > something like this for stock on their lot,
so those > cars are the mark of someone that wanted the image >
but > was VERY cost conscious - to the point of waiting >
for > a car to be built to their specification to save >
money > in many cases. > > With all due respect, I could
not disagree more. > > My base model has everything a LeBaron
has, > including front and rear air. > It is hardly a
"stripper." The idea of a stripper > Imperial is oxymoronic. >
The company would have frowned at the concept of its > ultimate
"desire" > vehicle being built in this way. The original
owner > of my car hated > leather, as well he might in Texas. I
heard this > from his niece. He had > issues trying to get a
Cadillac without leather plus > the Mopar dealership in > the
small town, Seguin, supplied him with other > vehicles for his several
> businesses plus a truck to pull his Tennessee > "Walking
Horses." To avoid > leather, he purchased the base model. Otherwise
it > is one of the most > loaded 58s ever made. Cost was not
the issue at > all. > > I have heard about manual windows
but not during the > 57 / 58 / 59 era. I'd > be very interested
to know who might have one or > have seen one. > >
Hugh > > > > > -----------------
http://www.imperialclub.com > ----------------- > This message
was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing > List. Please > reply
to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your > response will be >
shared with everyone. Private messages (and > attachments) for
the > Administrators should be sent to >
webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to >
http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > >
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing
List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response
will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for
the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To
UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Start
your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
|