Re: IML: '67 interior trim (was: Imperial Concept)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: '67 interior trim (was: Imperial Concept)
- From: Christopher H <imperial67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:54:55 -0800
Tacky interior trim...in a '67? Leather, chrome, genuine walnut and black
glass all in an incredible Danish Modern motif?
Perhaps you are recalling the reviews of the more plastic-laden and
fake-wood-trimmed 1969 model. I have never read a negative review from 1967
about these cars. In fact, even though some lamented the switch to Unibody
and the C-body platform, the interior completely held up the tradition.
But yes, my trunk does sound like a Jamaican drum when you close it. Oddly,
my '78 NYB's trunk provides such a satisfying sound that friends of mine
actually gather round whenever I open it to hear me close it!
Chris in LA
On 12/31/05 9:54 AM, jsadowski at jsadowski@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg and Russell" <65luxuryliner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: IML: Imperial Concept
>
>
>> I looked at the photos of the 'Chrysler Imperial' (why do the designers
>> feel it is so important to put the two words together?) last night and
>> posted my comments about the car. Figured I'd sleep on it and maybe in the
>> morning when I was fresh from a night's rest, I might see things a little
>> differently. Unfortunately I still am unimpressed and almost repulsed by
>> the photos I see in the article. The 'modern Chrysler designers' (lifted
>> right out of the copy) have done their level best(?) to replicate a Rolls
>> on a (stretched?) 300C platform! Where's the imagination and creativity?
>> If Chrysler's modern designers can imagine, create and actually build a
>> prototype that is as jaw-dropping as the Chronos, why are they stuck in
>> first gear with this mundane, should I say it, cartoonish(those 22" wheels
>> are ridiculous!) concept of an Imperial?
>>
>
> I remember when the 67 Imperial came out. Many felt the last real Imperials
> were gone.There were many negative comments of how the trunk lid sounded
> when slammed shut as well as a lot of tacky interior trim, the car looked
> too narrow etc.
> Today, that generation seems to be among the most favored.
> John
>
>
>
>
> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network