> Wow. Emission tests really are not a waste and do a lot to help air >quality. I remember what California was like in the 60s. From what you >said it sounds like it is running too rich when it is being run on the >dyno. Even though the car has a carburetor, a 1982 model has electronic >engine controls. It could be a problem with the carb, it could be an >oxygen sensor....and the list goes on. It is best to have it checked by >someone who knows the system. If it is running so rich that it is failing >the test repairing the problem will save you a lot of money on wasted fuel >as well as improving air quality. Don't get me wrong. I'm all for repairing the problem, but I'm 0 for 2 on that one. Since WA state requires you take your car to a "emissions" certified specialist, it seems that most of these (in my experience) are more interested in taking your top dollar than actually repairing anything. And that's my hangup-- that I don't want to spend a bundle of cash on something that's not going to fix me up. These cars are rare enough as it is. If they can't get it right on a Dodge Omni that was built in multitudes for 12 years, not to mention a Toyota Corolla, how can I have faith anyone is going to get it right on a car they made less than 3,000 of in my model year? ------------------- Nat Hall 1982 Imperial Coupe ------------------- ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm