RE: IML: 61 Imperial beats 59 Caddy

["Isenhour" <isenhour@xxxxxxxx>]

Well maybe up against a regular '57 or '58 Caddy but the '57 Eldorado
Brougham 4 door stainless steel top was a real head turner back then and
still is today. 

John;

Thanks for sharing such a wonderful trip and the events and cars with us 
all.  I certainly would have liked being there with you.

I agree that the '61 Imperial has a much more integrated look than a '59 
Caddy.  In '57 when the new body style Imperial was introduced it really 
put the Caddys at the time to shame too.  In my opinion the cars were 
more like 40-50 years ahead of their time in styling.  I liked the 
interiors of the '57-'60 Imperials better than the '61-'63 models.  The 
round gauge clusters just look more appealing than a rectangular shape 
to me.  I always thought the Imperial interior designers were caving in 
to the Caddy dash design when they did the later Imperials.  Of course 
each style has its pluses and minuses.  The Chryslers of the '60-'62 era 
had that fantastic 1/4 dome shaped instrument cluster that always drew 
quite a lot of attention too.

Imperials of the Exner era, especially the '57-'63 models had various 
bumper designs, both front and rear.  I liked the '59 rear bumper the 
best along with the '60 front bumper as having the most integral shape 
to fit with the overall styling.  I do like the separated headlight pods 
on the '61-'63 models, but thought the '58 and '60 front ends were quite 
good looking.








-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm