Re: IML: Lead Additive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: Lead Additive
- From: "Steve B." <Imperial59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:53:06 -0400
I would suggest converting the engine to unleaded. Lead was a lubricant
and without it you will fry the >softer leaded specific parts eventually.
Having to deal with unleaded additives is a science in itself and is very
>costly. An engine rebuild will pay itself off in a short period of time.
I burned up a lifter trying to keep up with >it and was always battling a
ping even with high octane gas. After my engine was rebuilt and converted
to >unleaded, I can run on 87 octane, all day long, and never have any
issues. Plus I got about another 10 HP >from just machining the heads a
hair off in the process. I have never had to worry about gas or additives
>since. Plus 87 octane is cheaper then 94 and the cost of additives in
every tank full. Trust me on this one.
The only leaded specific parts are the valve seats. Changing them has no
effect on the octane requirement of the engine. If you are running 87 with
no ping issues then your timing is not set correctly. On my '59 using 94
octane and setting the timing so it just barely pings under heavy throttle
make a tremendous difference in the amount of power. I sometimes pull the
timing back and run '87 when I am taking a road trip but I can't stand to
run it that way around town. Just tooooo slow.
Steve B.
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network