2.76+OD ---- fuel mileage
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

2.76+OD ---- fuel mileage




I'd be interested in fuel econ & a higher top end.
My cruising speed seems to be 40-45mph and I get @ 11mpg

>From: "D. Dardalis" <dardal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>At 01:41 PM 1/28/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>>       Carl..
>>         Minor problem here.. take 2.76 and multiply times .78  You will
>>         notice it gives you a really high top end gear, yes, but do you
>>         have enough motor to pull it... There is a point of diminished
>>         returns... That being if you have not enough motor to pull the
>>         weight of the auto then you must compensate by giving MORE gas,
>>         hence, lower mileage..
>This turns out into a popular subject.  An additional comment to Robb's
>statement.  This combination of 2.76 * 0.78 overdrive = 2.15 ratio would
>result in about 1600-1700 rpm converter output at 65 (don't know your tire
>size, so I am guessing).  When you load the torque converter at these low
>speeds climbing a hill, a lot of slippage will result which is nothing but
>direct loss of energy converted to transmission heat.  That's where you
>need the lockup converter.  The statement about higher engine load
>resulting in poorer fuel economy needs to be a bit more
>explained.  Typically, spark ignition engines are more efficient at higher
>loads, for two reasons, the most important of the two is that as the
>throttle opens, the intake restriction diminishes, so the "pumping" losses
>drop.  However, if the load of the engine is increased to the point where
>the mixture starts getting rich, then you might start loosing MPG.  This
>however happens fairly close to WOT, so it will have to be a very steep
>hill, in which case you have the option to down shift to direct..  The
>super low gear ratios like the 2.15 usually give better MPG's on the
>highway but at the loss of low speed performance and economy.   If I paid
>the $ for an overdrive, I 'd rather use it for performance, but one could
>rather choose to  maintain a relatively high ratio and use it for
>economy.  If in the US though, it might take many years to pay back through
>fuel savings.
>D^2
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.