57, 58, 59 Imperial conv left

["Dick Benjamin" <DickB@xxxxxxxxx>]

I almost hesitate to bring this up again, but the source of these "numbers"
has been discussed at length here on the IML, mostly in the very early days.
Some of us on the list are personally acquainted with the fellow who is
selling this "information".  I urge everyone to take these numbers with a
very large helping of salt.  It might make sense to throw both the salt and
the numbers over your shoulder, while you're at it!.

Check the IML archives for previous postings on this subject by Norm, Tony,
myself and others.  Use "AIC" or Automotive Information Clearinghouse for
your search argument.

Dick Benjamin
----- Original Message -----
From: <SpicemanII@xxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: IML: 57, 58, 59 Imperial conv left


> 57-69,       58-63,        59-66.
> THIS IS HOW MANY THEY SAY WERE LEFT IN 1984 FOR THESE THREE YEAR IMPERIAL
> CONVERTIBLES.  Joe Machado
>
>