From: "mike and cindy becker" <mbecker30@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:17:24 -0800
Both my 67's front rotors are in fine shape and I followed your progress on
the supra rotors with interest. I wonder if the later model c-body rotors
are heavier and could give me some more braking capacity(for my trailer
towing 4dr imp) also with a change to c-body rear axles I could then have
more options with the c-body bolt pattern wheels. I am not looking to
replace worn out parts, but to upgrade to something more heavy duty and more
option it the wheel department, Mike Becker
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Pittinaro" <mechimike@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: IML: 67 imp front rotors
> > Hi all, does anybody know exactly which parts need
> > to be changed to convert the 67 imp front rotors to
> > either a later style imp rotor or a reg bolt pattern
> > c-body. thanks, mike
>
> Lots. ;) You basically need to remove everything
> from between the suspension arms and replace it-
> spindles, calipers, rotors, abcking plate...and then
> you're still dealing with the difficulty of
> availability of these parts. The Supra rotors
> (Toyota), IMHO, are a better fix! that's what I have
> on my '67, and they work great so far after a few
> hundred miles of use, lots of stops. ;)
>
> www.anglefire.com/geek/ottotheresurrector for details
> on the conversion.
>
> =====
> --Mike Pittinaro
>
> My girlfriend left me
> My trusty Imperial
> Remains more faithful
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
> http://movies.yahoo.com/
>
>