I don't know if they tested "ZeroRust", but they tested everything that was
on the marked at that time (probably 7 -8 years ago now) and the results
were basically this: 90% plus of the products on the market were close to
useless, most of the remainder were a little help, but only two really did
the job, these were POR 15 and Corroless. Unless someone without an ax to
grind has done a study, I wouldn't take a chance on anything else.
Dick Benjamin
----- Original Message -----
From: clay-deb <clay-deb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: IML <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 3:29 PM
Subject: IML: Treating rusty metal
> For any IML'er that is thinking of treating the rusty metal of their
> Imperial with POR-15, I would invite them to check out this website
> http://www.zerorust.com/.
>
> Though I haven't tried this stuff yet, on the underside of my 67, it
comes
> HIGHLY recommended,and is supposedly much safer to use than POR-15.
> ZeroRust is actually supposed to out preformed POR-15 in a heads up test.
> Has anyone tried ,or heard of this stuff ?
> I remember reading that "Skinned Knuckles "restoration magazine tested
and
> rated all rust converter products on the market.
> Did they rate this product?.
> Of course I have no affiliation ,or financial interest whatsoever in
> ZeroRust.
> Clay Smith 67 Crown Coupe
>
>
>
>
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network