I don't know what all the fuss is about. I think the picture showing the view
out the windshield is pretty good. The rest of them have a kind of George
Romero "Night of the Living Dead" quality which is very arty.
On the positive side, the car does have coth seats. And it run, too. But it
has a harrness inside that needs wook. (Who doesn't need wook these days?)
And the interior needs to be reuphoisted. Having never uphoisted an interior
I'd be afraid to touch that job. Other than that, it seems pretty decent.
Maxiudo Ulrich wrote:
> dear members and peter:
>
> i just had to write back about peter's post:
>
> >For entertainment, do a search for 1969 LEBARN. Yes, that's right,
> >LEBARN. This guy's photography skills are even better than his
> >spelling.
>
> what on earth is the seller trying to show us in the photos? they're a riot
> and the best example of "how not to give away potentially useful
> information" in a photograph that i've ever seen.
>
> i highly encourage all members to obscurely photograph their own imperials
> and place pictures of same around your respective homes to confuse your
> guests.
>
> truly tickled,
>
> max
>
> 1962 crown imperial southampton
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network