Great news, thank you for sharing it.
jerry53
----- Original Message -----
From: <ViaJoaquin@xxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 3:21 PM
Subject: IML: California S.B. 708
Following is part of an E-mail that I received from Haggerty Insurance
announcing that Dean Florez is throwing in the towel on his bill to repeal
smog exemptions for 1973 and older California cars.
LEGISLATIVE ALERT UPDATE
Congratulations everyone on your hard work and commitment to stopping
Senator
Florez from pursuing his repeal in S.B. 708 of the current emissions
exemption for collector vehicles. Following is an article we thought you
would enjoy reading since it reports your tremendous legislative efforts and
victory. Keep up the good fight.
McKeel Hagerty
President, Hagerty Protection Network
FLOREZ REVERSES ON CLASSIC CAR SMOG RULES
By VIC POLLARD, Californian Sacramento Bureau
e-mail: vpollard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tuesday April 15, 2003, 10:56:17 PM
SACRAMENTO -- With Jay Leno and the rest of California's classic car buffs
on
his case, State Sen. Dean Florez has dropped his proposal to require smog
checks for cars as old as 1958 models.
Leno, "The Tonight Show" host who has a large collection of vintage autos,
personally called Florez's office to lobby against the plan.
The lawmaker was also inundated with letters, e-mails and phone calls from
many other members of the highly organized hobby car community.
One of their tools was a cartoon depicting Florez in his state-leased SUV
chasing classic cars out of California.
Florez was forced to back down on the bill, one in a package of 10 bills
aimed at cleaning up the air in the Central Valley, before it even got its
first legislative hearing.
The bill, SB 708, isn't dead, but it has been amended to crack down on cars
that emit visible smoke. Originally, it called for requiring regular smog
checks and repairs for cars up to 45 model years old. If in effect this
year,
it would apply to cars made in 1958 or later. That would have replaced the
state's existing exemption for cars older than 30 model years, which this
year is 1973.
"Given all the fights we have on all the other air pollution bills," Florez
said, "it wasn't going to help to push that one."
He said classic car fans made a convincing argument that most of the oldest
cars on the road, while they may be some of the worst polluters, aren't
usually driven to and from work daily.
"We told the classic car folks that we're going to continue to talk to
them,"
Florez continued, "but that was just too much of a detailed type of
proposal."
Florez's legislative aide, Michael Rubio, said Leno called after reading a
newspaper article about the smog bills.
" He said he wanted to know what the deal was with (SB) 708," Rubio said.
"Several days later, he called back and said, 'You've got me thinking now.'
And I said 'Can I start at the beginning?'"
He said Leno listened carefully and discussed his thoughts on the smog
problem and the bill at some length, urging Florez to carefully distinguish
between older cars that are driven for basic transportation and those that
are merely exhibited most of the time.
Other problems, he said, are the difficulty of getting repair parts for
older
cars and the fact that emission controls were not mandated on cars until the
late 1960s.
The same arguments were made by the classic car community's chief lobbyist,
Steve McDonald of the Special Equipment Marketing Association, a trade group
of manufacturers, retailers, publishers and restorers.
"Obviously we're thrilled that the senator has agreed to modify the
legislation and refocus the target on what we believe is a more effective
one, that being smoking vehicles," McDonald said.
So are hobbyists like Jan VanderPool of Bakersfield, who, with his fiancée,
owns three vintage Ford Mustangs.
" That's definitely a big relief to me," he said.
VanderPool said it took years and a lot of effort to get the rolling
exemption from smog checks for cars that are more than 30 years old enacted
in 1997.
Florez and his staff appeared surprised, if not shellshocked, at the size
and
aggressiveness of the lobbying campaign against the smog check proposal.
But it was no surprise to VanderPool, who has been through similar drills
before when legislation was proposed that helped or hurt car hobbyists.
"A lot of us have had to get pretty political," he said. "We've had to get
active and kind of watch our backs."
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network