Idler Arm Replacement found

[Jim Carpenter <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We have had discussion on this before!  The Chrysler arms fits the 
Imperials (depending on what year we are dealing with) and people have 
done this to their satisfaction but the arm is of different length.  As 
a result the toe in geometry will change slightly as you turn the wheels 
off center.  The Chrysler arm is much cheaper.  We can supply the 
correct steering and suspension arms for any of these vehicles.
Jim 

Bar00n wrote:

>Is this because of the different output shafts on the steeringboxes? I think
>that the Imps used the large output shaft and the 'regular' Chryslers had a
>slightly smaller one.
>
>Carl
>http://www.robdiesel.com
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Chris Boekhout" <charger69@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Been there, done that! The C-body Chrysler Idler arm is different
>than the Imperial Idler arm, in other words, you can't just take an Idler
>arm destined for a Fury, or a Newport and bolt it on Your Imperial, it is
>NOT the same part. My experience is with the 69-73 Fuselage Imperials, and
>earlier years may be different, but one thing I am sure of, the C-body idler
>arm does not fit the 69,70,71,72,73 Imperials.
>
>
>
>