Another Imperial?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Another Imperial?



You may be right Peter. There has been a big push for retro-styling and, as you 
suggest in names such as the 300M. Someone else pointed out, though, that since 
no one remembers the name Imperial, Chrysler would have no reason to bring it 
back. 

At first I thought he was wrong about no one remembering the name, but 
actually, when I drive my Imperials I am constantly bombarded with questions 
like "What is an Imperial?". My usual response is "You're looking at one, the 
best cars from Chrysler at the time". Very few people remember them unless a 
family member had one or they drove one themselves, even in the old car 
community.

If the company brought back the name they would have to do it with the intent 
of making a big profit. The name never sold a lot of cars before, so why would 
that be any different now. Part of the mystic of the 300 letter series was that 
it was known as a limited production performance car. Also, the 300 non-letter 
series nameplate was very successful on its own. This was really never the case 
for the Imperial. It's "limited production" was mostly due to its lack of 
success in the marketplace. 

Time will tell, but I think it would be very surprising for them to bring back 
the name Imperial.

Paul

In a message dated 1/22/2004 12:47:19 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
theswainsons@xxxxxxx writes:

> As a Chrysler dealer & what I have seen coming down the road, I think the 
>Imperial name may resurface. The 300C is a big rear wheel drive sedan with a 
>340 hp V8 called a Hemi. Think about it......
> Peter.----- Original Message -----
> From: "Woolf,Richard" <richard.woolf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:37 am 
> Subject: RE: IML: Exner Years 
> > This was a topic I brought up about 4 months ago. It would be nice 
> > if they 
> > did, but as long as Mercedes has controlling interest I don't 
> > think it will 
> > happen. 
> > R. Woolf 
> > '66 Crown 
> > '73 LeBaron 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: SWM907@xxxxxxx [SWM907@xxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:27 AM 
> > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > Subject: Re: IML: Exner Years 
> > 
> > 
> > DO YOU THINK CHRYSLER WILL EVER INTRODUCE THE IMPERIALS BACK ON 
> > THE MARKET 
> > IN YEARS TO COME? THANKS STEVE MOORE 
> > 
> > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This 
>message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to 
>mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. 
>Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to 
>webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to 
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm 



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.