It is, it was a typo. I wrote a note to the seller and he wrote back.
Paul
In a message dated 3/1/2004 3:23:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, Qlv@xxxxxxxxx
writes:
>
>
> My 1953 is a 331.5 c.u. I would think a '66 would be more than that.
>
> Quint
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kate Triplett" <ad_ablurr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:46 AM
> Subject: IML: 318 in 66???
>
>
> > Ok all you Imperialists who know more than I do - I had been under the
> impression (for the past 30-plus years) that the 66 Imperial had 440 as the
> standard and only engine. Per text in this listing, this "kept all original"
> caar has a new 318....
> >
> >
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2463919658&category=43905
> >
> > Personally I think a 318 would be a tad underpowered in a 66, as I
> remember that my old 66 (30-plus years ago, admittedly) was a pretty big
> car.
> >
> >
> > Kate Justet Triplett
> > Kate's Custom Gunleather
> > Monroe, Washington
> > Proudly a member of NRA
> > and owner of "Lucille" 1968 Crown 4 door HT
> >
> >
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network